2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-14698-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit card fraud detection using ensemble data mining methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study [13] trains a set of 100 hyperparameters of LGBM and achieves a TPR result of about 60%. The study [15] trains a set of 25 LGBM and achieves a TPR result of about 80%. Also, the study [14] utilizes ensemble learning algorithms to achieve a TPR result of 90%.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methods In New Bank Account...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study [13] trains a set of 100 hyperparameters of LGBM and achieves a TPR result of about 60%. The study [15] trains a set of 25 LGBM and achieves a TPR result of about 80%. Also, the study [14] utilizes ensemble learning algorithms to achieve a TPR result of 90%.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methods In New Bank Account...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is put up against other classi ers like NB, SVM, and ANN and is discovered to offer effective results with high accuracy. The study [24][25][26] suggests using Bayesian optimization and class weight-tuning to identify fraudulent features in credit card transactions using gradient boosting and category boosting as an ensemble approach, the authors found Bayesian optimization to be e cient in improving computational time and performance. Additionally, deep learning [24] is used to optimize the hyperparameters and get better outcomes.…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms For Fraud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous well-liked classification methods have been developed over the past few decades, including support vector machine (SVM), naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and genetic algorithm (GA) algorithms for feature selection [19] have been proposed. Bakhtiari et al [20] provide ensemble learning techniques for identifying credit card fraud that incorporate gradient boosting (LightGBM and LiteMORT), and they combine these techniques by employing averaging techniques (simple and weighted averaging techniques) before being evaluated. By combining these approaches, error rates are decreased while efficiency and accuracy are improved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, machine learning (ML), data mining, and traditional statistical classification approaches have all been used effectively [7]. Credit card fraud has been successfully detected using a variety of artificial neural network (ANN) models [8], which, by replicating the characteristics of interacting neurons, are renowned for their ability to simulate extremely non-linear and complex functions from the ground up [9]. Additionally, studies have been conducted utilizing explicit entity-relation networks to identify probable fraud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%