2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit rationing in small firm-bank relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative coefficient of the loan number suggests a decrease in loan volume ratio over the course of repeated borrowing, which is in line with Behr et al. () and Kirschenmann (). Thus, a reduction in information asymmetries between lender and borrower is reflected by an increase in loan volume.…”
Section: Progressive Lending To Farmers and Non‐farmerssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The negative coefficient of the loan number suggests a decrease in loan volume ratio over the course of repeated borrowing, which is in line with Behr et al. () and Kirschenmann (). Thus, a reduction in information asymmetries between lender and borrower is reflected by an increase in loan volume.…”
Section: Progressive Lending To Farmers and Non‐farmerssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Over the course of repeated borrowing, the mitigation of informational obstacles is represented by a rationing decrease. Considering ex‐post loan performance, the results reveal that rationing generally does increase the probability to default regardless of the firm's opaqueness, and that the statistically significant default decreasing effect of repeated borrowing does not occur until later in the relationship (Kirschenmann, ).…”
Section: Previous Empirical Findings and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This comes at the disadvantage that we cannot observe differences over a client relationship as for example documented for credit rationing by Kirschenmann ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This comes at the disadvantage that we cannot observe differences over a client relationship as for example documented for credit rationing by Kirschenmann (2016). 16 Only 2% of loans were granted in a currency different from the requested currency (for 1% of loans, the application was in Euro and the granted loan in RON and for 1% of loans the application was in RON and the granted loan in Euro).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%