2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00254-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit risk assessment using a multicriteria hierarchical discrimination approach: A comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Altman's variables are more or less the 25% of all the variables in Table 1, as to say that the informative contents of the two sets of variables are so different that they have a significant impact on the rating. The results in terms of distribution of bankrupt firms in rating classes presented in [24,Tables 15,32,33] show that, in all the considered years, there is a slight decrease of the number of bankrupt firms in the first (best) class, and a slight increase of the number of the bankrupt enterprises in the last (worst) class. Therefore, it appears that MURAME methodology, when using only the Altman's variables, rates slightly better the bankrupt firms in the extreme classes than when using all the variables of Table 1.…”
Section: Data Set and Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the Altman's variables are more or less the 25% of all the variables in Table 1, as to say that the informative contents of the two sets of variables are so different that they have a significant impact on the rating. The results in terms of distribution of bankrupt firms in rating classes presented in [24,Tables 15,32,33] show that, in all the considered years, there is a slight decrease of the number of bankrupt firms in the first (best) class, and a slight increase of the number of the bankrupt enterprises in the last (worst) class. Therefore, it appears that MURAME methodology, when using only the Altman's variables, rates slightly better the bankrupt firms in the extreme classes than when using all the variables of Table 1.…”
Section: Data Set and Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Many methodologies which fall within MCDA have been widely adopted to support several kinds of real-life decision problems, as showed in [38], including financial decisions. Among the financial applications of MCDA, those regarding creditworthiness evaluations play a relevant role (see [47], [33], [34], [8], [35], [39], [25], [23]). Moreover, a few recent studies built MCDA models to specifically evaluate SMEs creditworthiness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doumpos and Zopounidis (2002) who worked on mathematical programming previously applied UTADIS method in order to obtain a high performance of financial manipulation forecasting. UTADIS being mainly a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, aims to classify the observations into different groups.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling Versus Statistical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, as recognized by many (e.g. Altman, Saunders 1998;Lopez, Saidenberg 2000;Doumpos, Zopounidis 2001;Doumpos et al 2002;Mačerinskienė, Ivaškevičiūtė 2008;Thomas 2009;Twala 2010), despite the strengths and widespread application of current methodologies, models, techniques and/or simple applications, each solution has specific drawbacks where clarification is required on a number of issues. For example, observed a lack of transparency in the way trade-offs among evaluation criteria are made explicit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%