2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2011.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit supply and corporate capital structure: Evidence from Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many earlier studies argue that credit supply conditions are an important factor in firms' financing decisions. Voutsinas and Werner (2011) find that extreme credit supply fluctuations in Japan (asset bubble burst in 1989 and banking crises in 1998) had a significant impact on Japanese firms' capital structure. They find that a decrease in the supply of credit will affect negatively firm's leverage ratios.…”
Section: Determinants Of Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many earlier studies argue that credit supply conditions are an important factor in firms' financing decisions. Voutsinas and Werner (2011) find that extreme credit supply fluctuations in Japan (asset bubble burst in 1989 and banking crises in 1998) had a significant impact on Japanese firms' capital structure. They find that a decrease in the supply of credit will affect negatively firm's leverage ratios.…”
Section: Determinants Of Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…7, No. 3;2015 In this context, a few studies show there is a direct link between the portion of tangible assets and leverage consisting with the Pecking Order Theory (Michaelas et al, 1999;Amidu, 2007 Voutsinas and Werner (2011) have adopted the most ubiquitous means to measure tangibility as the ratio of fixed assets to total assets. In this study, the calculation works the same way.…”
Section: Tangibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 equals to 1, while 2 is the ratio of the standard deviation of the stock price index over the standard deviation of the house price index. Alternatively, Voutsinas and Werner (2011a) indicate the boom and the burst phase in their study based on the trend of lending growth rate in Japan over the 1980-1999 periods. The dummy variable equals 1 over the boom period (1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989), and 0 during the burst period (1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999).…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%