2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep and dynamic mechanical behavior of PP–jute composites: Effect of the interfacial adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of flame retardant increased the modulus reduction value to 65%, while its highest magnitude obtained for mPET was 85%. As compared to the modulus reductions of srPP ranging between 71.5 and 87% [31][32][33] and those of natural fiber composites (between 65 and 75%) [23][24][25][26][27][28], the studied srrPET composites exhibited superior creep resistance.…”
Section: Long-term Creep Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The addition of flame retardant increased the modulus reduction value to 65%, while its highest magnitude obtained for mPET was 85%. As compared to the modulus reductions of srPP ranging between 71.5 and 87% [31][32][33] and those of natural fiber composites (between 65 and 75%) [23][24][25][26][27][28], the studied srrPET composites exhibited superior creep resistance.…”
Section: Long-term Creep Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used extrapolation techniques is represented by the time-temperature superposition principle (TTSP), which utilizes real-time short-term creep responses obtained at elevated temperatures. Although TTSP was initially used only for pure polymers, numerous studies have utilized this principle to predict the long-term creep behavior of carbon-, glass-, and natural fiber-reinforced composites [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Due to the aging of the polypropylene matrix with time, TTSP successfully predicted the long-term creep response of polymer composites at ambient temperature, but was found to be unsuitable at higher temperatures [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lignin in fiber is an advantage in biocomposite production. Lignin affects the compatibility between fibers and a polymer; it acts as a natural coupling agent due to its polar hydroxyl groups and non-polar hydrocarbon and benzene rings (Acha et al 2007). A validation experiment was carried out with the parameters as suggested by the model, and the comparison between the predicted and experimental values are summarized in Table 7.…”
Section: Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural fiber-reinforced composites are emerging as replacements for those with synthetic fibers, as they are more environmentally friendly and more cost-effective than petroleum-based materials. Natural fibers offer several advantages to the composite industry, such as low density, high toughness, good specific strength properties, good thermal and insulation properties, low cost, non-abrasiveness on the processing equipment, biodegradability, and easy recycling (Acha et al 2007;BogoevaGaceva et al 2007;Raju et al 2008;Spoljaric et al 2009;Akil et al 2011). Therefore, the demands for natural fiber-reinforced composites have increased greatly over the past few years for various commercial applications (Akil et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A et.al. [9] studied the dynamic mechanical response and the short term creep-recovery behavior of composites made from bidirectional jute fabrics and polypropylene. Rahman, M. R et.al., [10] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%