2009
DOI: 10.1680/macr.2008.00117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep and shrinkage of HPC in prebended composite structures. Part II: in situ case study

Abstract: A prefabricated, prebended and prestressed railway bridge deck was instrumented in June 2000 with strain gauges and vibrating wire extensometers. It is a kind of structure in which large time-dependent stress redistributions between steel and concrete are expected to occur. The purpose of this paper is to report on the comparison between strains recorded in situ on an instrumented bridge deck of this kind up to four years after its construction with values computed within the framework of four different time-d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…adjustment parameters C free water content C eq water content at the equilibrium with the external relative humidity C ini initial water content in concrete C ì stiffness of the ìth Kelvin unit c o initial cement content C 1 water content owing to the drying process and the water consumption by the cement hydration reaction C 2 water content owing to the internal water consumption by the cement hydration reaction C 100 water content corresponding to a relative humidity of 100% @C/@h slope of the desorption isotherm D diffusion coefficient E a activation energy E 0 p c j delayed modulus of the jth concrete phase at time t p ECH exchange coefficient f c, 28 average compressive strength at 28 days h internal relative humidity J compliance function K slope k coefficient of hydrous contraction m i ratio between the mass of each anhydrous compound and the total mass of cement N number of Kelvin units n normal to the boundary of the volume element P 0 initial mass (˜P/P) relative mass loss (˜P/P) 0 threshold of the relative mass loss p index of the time step p i mass of water which is needed for a complete hydration of each cement anhydrous compound per unit mass of the anhydrous compound Q activation energy with the influence of the temperature on the kinetics of drying ¼ 4700 K À1 q water content which is consumed per hydrated cement unit R gas constant S surface T temperature of concrete at a given time…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…adjustment parameters C free water content C eq water content at the equilibrium with the external relative humidity C ini initial water content in concrete C ì stiffness of the ìth Kelvin unit c o initial cement content C 1 water content owing to the drying process and the water consumption by the cement hydration reaction C 2 water content owing to the internal water consumption by the cement hydration reaction C 100 water content corresponding to a relative humidity of 100% @C/@h slope of the desorption isotherm D diffusion coefficient E a activation energy E 0 p c j delayed modulus of the jth concrete phase at time t p ECH exchange coefficient f c, 28 average compressive strength at 28 days h internal relative humidity J compliance function K slope k coefficient of hydrous contraction m i ratio between the mass of each anhydrous compound and the total mass of cement N number of Kelvin units n normal to the boundary of the volume element P 0 initial mass (˜P/P) relative mass loss (˜P/P) 0 threshold of the relative mass loss p index of the time step p i mass of water which is needed for a complete hydration of each cement anhydrous compound per unit mass of the anhydrous compound Q activation energy with the influence of the temperature on the kinetics of drying ¼ 4700 K À1 q water content which is consumed per hydrated cement unit R gas constant S surface T temperature of concrete at a given time…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature of concrete at the initial time T 1 ultimate temperature during the adiabatic calorimetric experiment t time w…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%