2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep damage in small punch creep specimens of Type 304 stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the FE calculations show that the peak damage location is, in both cases, near the bottom surface of the specimen and in line with the contact edge between the punch and the specimen (agreeing with previous observations from the literature [3,43]). The region where peak damage is located, defined in the literature as the most critical location of the specimen [16,28], exhibits a global creep enhancement.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the FE calculations show that the peak damage location is, in both cases, near the bottom surface of the specimen and in line with the contact edge between the punch and the specimen (agreeing with previous observations from the literature [3,43]). The region where peak damage is located, defined in the literature as the most critical location of the specimen [16,28], exhibits a global creep enhancement.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In view of these requirements, the CAX4RH element type, available in ABAQUS, was used. The elements are refined near the edge of the unsupported region of the specimen, where significant bending deformation take place, and in the region close to the contact edge between the punch and the specimen, which was identified as the most critical location in the specimen [16,28,43].…”
Section: Element Choice and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…simply supported constrains, are adopted instead of modelling the holder and the support [26][27][28]. In particular Dymáček et al show that if the punch load is less than 400 N and the upper and lower dies are not allowed to deform during the test, the time to rupture obtained by the FE analyses is closer to the experimental time to failure [26].…”
Section: Model Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that void volume fraction at the center of specimen are obviously higher than those near to edge at the same time, and the initial crack for stress concentration is away from center with the increment of friction coefficient while it was 0.1, 0.3, and 0.4, respectively. The reason is due to the local thickness reduction which suggests that the damage is an inhomogeneous process for degradation of material properties [13,26]. Compared with Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Detailed simulation about void growth, coalescence and the promotion of secondary microvoids in deformation were performed in early investigation in order to get a precise forecast of fracture, finite element model was expected to be used in rupture [12]. Ling et al [13] evaluated the creep damage in the small punch test by finite element method and proved the potential of small punch test to describe damage properties. However, the plastic damage assessment of metal using small punch test is still in its infancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%