2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep effects on the Campbell response in type-II superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These have been developed in several stages: originating in the sixties of the last century, weak pinning and creep 9 has been further developed with the discovery of high temperature superconductors as a subfield of vortex matter physics 18 . Strong pinning was originally introduced by Labusch 8 and by Larkin and Ovchinnikov 9 and has been further developed recently with several works studying critical currents 10 , current-voltage characteristics 11,19 , magnetic field penetration 12,20,21 , and creep 13,21,22 ; results on numerical simulations involving strong pins have been reported in Refs. 23-25. The two theories come together at the onset of strong pinning: an individual defect is qualified as weak if it is unable to pin a vortex, i.e., a vortex traverses the pin smoothly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been developed in several stages: originating in the sixties of the last century, weak pinning and creep 9 has been further developed with the discovery of high temperature superconductors as a subfield of vortex matter physics 18 . Strong pinning was originally introduced by Labusch 8 and by Larkin and Ovchinnikov 9 and has been further developed recently with several works studying critical currents 10 , current-voltage characteristics 11,19 , magnetic field penetration 12,20,21 , and creep 13,21,22 ; results on numerical simulations involving strong pins have been reported in Refs. 23-25. The two theories come together at the onset of strong pinning: an individual defect is qualified as weak if it is unable to pin a vortex, i.e., a vortex traverses the pin smoothly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%