2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep–fatigue damage for a structure with dissimilar metal welds of modified 9Cr–1Mo steel and 316L stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, many researchers [18,19] reported about the effect of carbon diffusion against strength and corrosion properties of the dissimilar weldment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, many researchers [18,19] reported about the effect of carbon diffusion against strength and corrosion properties of the dissimilar weldment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5(b) from the structural creep-fatigue test shown in Fig. 5(b) [10] were used. In the structural test, a hold time of two hours at about 550qC was applied, but the hold time was extended to 10,000 hours in this analysis as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of the Hot Duct Pipingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an actual design evaluation, however, creep-fatigue damage limits are usually more critical than the other two limits [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9Cr-1Mo steel specimens were evaluated and compared with the results by an assessment according to the A16 guide and tests [10][11][12][13]. In this study, two results for the creep-fatigue damage and the creep-fatigue crack behaviour have been compared for an austenitic stainless steel structure with weldments and the results were compared to quantify the conservatism of the guidelines for a high temperature design and assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%