2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep rupture assessment by a robust creep data interpolation using the Linear Matching Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al have also proved its performance by presenting accurate limit loads and shakedown boundaries of a single 90° pipe bend [15]. In addition, the LMM has been utilised to analyse cyclic plasticity of various industrial structures including composite materials with or without creep effect [16][17][18][19]. Upon these reasons, the LMM is selected to use in this paper to analyse the limit, shakedown, and ratchet boundaries of the 90° back-to-back pipe bends.…”
Section: Iterative Elastic Techniques Are a Typical Approach Of Direcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al have also proved its performance by presenting accurate limit loads and shakedown boundaries of a single 90° pipe bend [15]. In addition, the LMM has been utilised to analyse cyclic plasticity of various industrial structures including composite materials with or without creep effect [16][17][18][19]. Upon these reasons, the LMM is selected to use in this paper to analyse the limit, shakedown, and ratchet boundaries of the 90° back-to-back pipe bends.…”
Section: Iterative Elastic Techniques Are a Typical Approach Of Direcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For industrial application, some simplified structural analysis methods, which are based upon the limit analysis and shakedown concepts and make full use of the creep rupture data, are utilised in integrity assessment procedure R5 (Ainsworth, 2003) and ASME NH (ASME, 2013). Such methods are able to directly simulate the creep rupture phenomenon without needing the development of detailed constitutive descriptions but a small number of material parameters, and can provide simple but reasonable assessment results (Barbera and Chen, 2015;Chen et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear matching method (LMM) (Chen and Ponter, 2001), matching the nonlinear material behavior to a linear one, was originally proposed for evaluation of plastic limit and shakedown limit loads of elastoplastic structures. For the sake of evaluating the maximum permissible load or predicting the creep rupture life of creeping structures, Chen et al (2003) extended the LMM to include the creep rupture effect via combining the shakedown analysis procedure with creep rupture data (Barbera and Chen, 2015;Chen et al, 2006), achieving the same function but with more accurate results as these simplified methods in integrity assessment procedure R5 (Ainsworth, 2003). In this way, the assessment of creep rupture limit was essentially translated into a shakedown analysis with a revised yield strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a real complex engineering component is considered, these shakedown analyses are translated into the tremendous optimization problems which are hard to solve. Besides the mathematic programming methods, there are still some other direct methods, such as the elastic compensation method (ECM) (Ponter and Carter, 1997a, b;Ponter and Engelhardt, 2000), the linear matching method (LMM) (Chen and Ponter, 2001;Chen, 2010;Barbera and Chen, 2015;Barbera et al, 2017) and the stress compensation method (SCM) (Peng et al, 2018), which go around the difficulty of the optimization problem and are more suitable for practical engineering applications. The LMM simulates the plastic behavior via a series of full elastic solutions with variable moduli in time and space to evaluate shakedown limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%