Creep Versus Consolidation in Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground—Part A: Basic Time Effects

Abstract

Although squeezing ground may undergo rapid convergences following tunnel excavation, its behaviour is often markedly time dependent due to creep or consolidation. The effects of creep and consolidation on shield tunnelling are comparatively evaluated in two companion papers, with the aim of demonstrating their qualitative similarities and distinctive features. The present, first paper investigates the basic time effects, placing focus on the time development of ground deformations and the complex interaction between ground, tunnel boring machine (TBM) and tunnel support during excavation and during construction standstills. The presented numerical simulations indicate several qualitative similarities between the two mechanisms of time dependency, in respect of the time development of ground deformations, the counter-intuitive behaviour of increasing shield loading with increasing rate of advance under certain conditions, as well as the thoroughly adverse effect of the additional time-dependent deformations taking place during construction standstills on the shield loading. However, they also underscore two prominent differences resulting from the fundamentally different nature of creep (a purely mechanical rheological process) and consolidation (a coupled hydromechanical process): first, the consistently more extensive plastic yielding in consolidating ground, which is partially associated with the seepage forces exerted by the pore water on the solid rock constituents. Second, the role of seepage forces as a potential destabilising agent, particularly for the tunnel face, which does not happen in the case of creep and may be critical for shield and cutterhead jamming. Building upon these investigations, the companion paper compares creep and consolidation with respect to the transferability of experiences about the required thrust force to tunnels of different diameter or to adjacent tunnels.