Crestal Bone–Level Changes Around Implants Placed in Post‐Extraction Sockets Augmented With Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft: A Retrospective Radiographic Study

Koutouzis, Theofilos; Lundgren, Tord M.

doi:10.1902/jop.2010.100175

Cited by 27 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The result of the present works showed that immediate dental implant placement with biphasic calcium phos- phate (BCP) coated with polyactide -co -glycolide (PLGA) gives better results as compared to immediate dental implant alone. These findings are in agreement with results of [23].…”

Section: Discusionsupporting

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Immediate Dental Implant Augmented with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Coated by Polylactide - co-Glycolide Versus to Immediate Dental Implant Only

Attia¹,

Abozaid²,

Edrees³

et al. 2017

IJDOH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Numerous bone grafts have been studied for augmentation of the healing outcomes of dental implants. The aim of this study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic evaluation between immediate dental implant augmented with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) coated with polylactide -co-glycolide (PLGA) and immediate dental implant alone. Materials and Methods:Twenty adult male patients with endodontic failure, root fracture, decayed tooth, retained deciduous teeth and teeth with internal/external root resorption were selected and categorized into the followings; Group 1(G1); received immediate implant only and group 2 (G2); received immediate implants augmented with (BCP/PLGA). The patients were evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months, clinically; by using plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and Pocket depth (PD). In addition, radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level (MBL) and measurement of bone density (BD).Results: Clinical improvement of GI and PI were observed in both groups, the statistical analysis were non-significant in comparisons at different time intervals. PD was significantly reduced in G1at 6 months versus baseline and highly significant at 12 months compared to baseline, in G2 the comparisons at 6 and 12 months contrast to baseline was highly significant, and whereas the differences at 12 months were significant reduced in G2 than G1. Radiographically, MBL was showing highly statistical significant in comparing the baseline versus 12 months in both groups, but at the difference at 6 months compared to baseline was highly significant in G1, while insignificant in G2. Moreover, there is no significant difference in G1 against G2 at 6 and 12 months. In addition, the bone density was showing highly statistical significant in comparing the baseline contrast to 6 and 12 months in both groups, and highly significant differences were observed in G2 compared G1at 6, and 12 months. Conclusion: Immediate dental implant augmented with BCP/PLGA achieved significant improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes rather than immediate dental implant only.

show abstract

Section: Discusionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…These findings is similar to a results obtained from a study by [33], they compared bone level changes around implants placed in post extraction sockets augmented with DFDBA to implants placed in native bone. The mean marginal bone loss was a mean of (0.15 mm) for both groups at the 12 month follow-up.…”

Section: Discusionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Evaluation of Immediate Dental Implant Augmented with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Coated by Polylactide - co-Glycolide Versus to Immediate Dental Implant Only

Attia¹,

Abozaid²,

Edrees³

et al. 2017

IJDOH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More recent human studies confirmed the efficacy of demineralized freeze-dried bone in augmentation procedures combined with implant therapy [43–45]. Authors from a recent retrospective radiographic study, whereby demineralized freeze-died bone was used in post-extraction sockets exhibited similar marginal bone loss to implants placed in patients bone [46]. …”

Section: Nonautogenous Graft Materialsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Soft and Hard Tissue Management in Implant Therapy—Part I: Surgical Concepts

D’Addona

Ghassemian

Raffaelli

et al. 2012

International Journal of Biomaterials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant therapy has become a reliable and predictable treatment alternative for the replacement of missing teeth with conventional removable and fixed partial dentures. Recently though, in the pursuit for improved esthetics, the literature has dedicated a considerable amount of its research on the successful maintenance and regeneration of the surrounding gingiva and bone, which are lost following extraction of a tooth. Thoroughly analyzing the anatomic situation and well-planned treatment has become a requirement, because incorrectly planned and positioned implants may jeopardize long-term esthetic and functional prognosis. In addition, many types of biocompatible materials, autogenous hard and soft tissue grafts, and different surgical techniques have been developed, and their viability has been investigated. As a result, implant specialists have gained a greater understanding of the dynamics and anatomical and biological concepts of the periodontium and peri-implant tissues both at the surgical and prosthetic phases of treatment, which contributes to better soft and hard tissue management (SHTM). This may further contribute to achieving a superior final result which is obtained by having a harmonious soft tissue profile, a correctly placed and contoured final restoration, and the reestablishment of masticatory function and phonetics.

show abstract

“…[21][22] Although, some argue that the crestal bone loss after immediate implant placement with/without bone grafting are clinically acceptable. [23][24][25] Therefore, evaluation for the appropriateness of immediate implant should be individually assessed in order to provide the best outcome.…”

Section: Immediate Implantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Associated With Crestal Bone Loss Following Dental Implant Placement in a Longitudinal Follow-up Study

Kim

Dodson

Tien

et al. 2015

Journal of Oral Implantology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to estimate the magnitude of crestal bone loss and to identify factors associated with changes in crestal bone height following placement of dental implants. This was a retrospective cohort study, consisting of a sample derived from the population of patients who had at least 1 dental implant placed in a community practice over a 10-year period. A total of 11 predictor variables were grouped into demographic, related health status, anatomic, implant-specific, and operative categories. The primary outcome variable was a change in crestal bone height (mm) over the course of follow-up. The secondary outcome variable was crestal bone loss at 1 year grouped into 2 categories (bone loss >1.5 mm and ≤1.5 mm). Univariate and multivariate regression mixed-effects models were developed to identify variables associated with crestal bone level changes over time. P values ≤.05 were considered statistically significant. The study sample was composed of 85 subjects who received 148 implants. The mean change of the crestal bone was -2.1 ± 1.5 mm (range = -12.5 to 0.5 mm; median = -1.77 mm). In the multivariate model, none of the variables studied were statistically associated with mean crestal bone loss. Among 84 (66.1%) implants with bone loss >1.5 mm within 1 year, no variables were associated with bone loss in the multivariate model. Of the 11 predictor variables evaluated in this study, none were statistically significant with regard to an increased risk for crestal bone loss or for excessive bone loss within the first year after implant placement.

show abstract

Crestal Bone–Level Changes Around Implants Placed in Post‐Extraction Sockets Augmented With Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft: A Retrospective Radiographic Study

Abstract: The present study indicates implants placed in post-extraction sockets augmented with DFDBA exhibited minimal marginal bone loss similar to implants placed in native bone.

Cited by 27 publications

References 29 publications

Evaluation of Immediate Dental Implant Augmented with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Coated by Polylactide - co-Glycolide Versus to Immediate Dental Implant Only

Evaluation of Immediate Dental Implant Augmented with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Coated by Polylactide - co-Glycolide Versus to Immediate Dental Implant Only

Soft and Hard Tissue Management in Implant Therapy—Part I: Surgical Concepts

Factors Associated With Crestal Bone Loss Following Dental Implant Placement in a Longitudinal Follow-up Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About