Crestal bone loss around submerged and nonsubmerged dental implants: A systematic review

Radiographic and clinical outcomes of rooted, platform‐switched, microthreaded implants with a sandblasted, large‐grid, and acid‐etched surface: A 5‐year prospective study

“…In addition, no significant effect of the surgical protocol (nonsubmerged vs submerged), different sites (mesial vs distal aspect), and jaw position (maxilla vs mandible) on the extent of the bone loss could be evidenced in the present study. A recent systematic review made a similar conclusion. In contrast, Ho and Salamanca compared 60 ITI Straumann nonsubmerged dental implants with 60 Xive Dentsply submerged dental implants.…”

Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around platform‐switched implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36‐month results from a prospective split‐mouth clinical trial

“…). In a recent systematic review (Al Amri ), human‐ and animal‐based studies showed no significant difference in CBL around crestally and subcrestally placed dental implants, although some studies found significant differences (Calvo‐Guirado et al. , ; Aimetti et al.…”

“…Moreover, results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (Palaska et al. ) and a recent systematic review (Al Amri ) showed no statistically significant difference in CBL around crestally and subcrestally placed dental implants. Similar results were reported by Koh et al.…”

Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Immunologic Inflammatory Parameters around Crestally and Subcrestally Placed Dental Implants: 5‐Year Retrospective Results

“…However, contradictory results have also been reported. In a recent systematic review, Al Amri reviewed 13 studies (6 clinical and 7 animal‐model based) to determine whether crestal and subcrestal placement of dental implants influence crestal bone level . The results showed no statistically significant difference in CBL around implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels .…”

“…In a recent systematic review, Al Amri reviewed 13 studies (6 clinical and 7 animal‐model based) to determine whether crestal and subcrestal placement of dental implants influence crestal bone level . The results showed no statistically significant difference in CBL around implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels . It is therefore hypothesized that (a) peri‐implant clinical (bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing pocket depth [PPD]) and radiographic (CBL) parameters are comparable around dental implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels; and (b) levels of IL‐1β and MMP‐9 in the PICF are similar around crestally and subcrestally placed dental implants.…”