2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2009.00905.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cretaceous opine bivalves from the Pacific slope of North America and palaeobiogeography of subfamily Opinae Chavan, 1969

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) stated that the hinge characters and sculpture of this species "leave little doubt as to its generic position." Squires and Saul (2009) reported that the rocks at this locality are Early Cretaceous (either Hauterivian or Barremian) in age. Both cotypes (UNSM 23046) of Stanton's species are illustrated photographically here for the first time ( Fig.…”
Section: Global Overview Of Cretaceous and Paleocene Glycymeridinesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…) stated that the hinge characters and sculpture of this species "leave little doubt as to its generic position." Squires and Saul (2009) reported that the rocks at this locality are Early Cretaceous (either Hauterivian or Barremian) in age. Both cotypes (UNSM 23046) of Stanton's species are illustrated photographically here for the first time ( Fig.…”
Section: Global Overview Of Cretaceous and Paleocene Glycymeridinesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…1) is suggested to differ from the original latitudinal location because of the effects of terrane transport. Work on Cretaceous acilid bivalves (Squires and Saul, 2006), volutid gastropods (Saul and Squires, 2008), and opine bivalves (Squires and Saul, 2009) support the paleomagnetism and rudist-bivalve analyses by Kodama and Ward (2001) that the Nanaimo Group was 1) originally deposited no farther south than 40°N (i.e., northern California) and 2) technically displaced during post-Cretaceous time to its current position in the Vancouver Island area.…”
Section: Paleobiogeography Of the Studied Glycymerididsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current summaries of the geological details of the formations and members containing study area Atira can be found in the following papers (listed in ascending chronostratigraphic order): Hornbrook Formation, Osburger Gulch Member (Squires and Saul, 2003a); Redding Formation, Frazier Siltstone Member (Squires and Saul, 2003b); Ladd Formation, upper Baker Canyon Member (Squires and Saul, 2003c); Ladd Formation, lower and middle Holz Member (Saul, 1982); Chico Formation at Granite Bay [= Texas Flat = Rock Corral] (Squires and Saul, 2009); Cedar District Formation and Chatsworth Formation (Squires and Saul, 2001); upper Tuna Canyon Formation (Squires and Saul, 2009); Chico Formation, Musty Buck Member (Squires and Saul, 2003c); Williams Formation, Pleasants Sandstone Member (Squires and Saul, 2001); El Piojo Formation (Squires and Saul, 2009); Moreno Formation, Tierra Loma Member (Squires and Saul, 2006); Deer Valley Formation (Squires and Saul, 2006); and Panoche Formation near Martinez, California (Squires and Saul, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyropsis grahami n. sp. is found in rocks of late early Campanian age in southern British Columbia but as discussed in Saul and Squires (2008) and Squires and Saul (2009), Late Cretaceous fossil localities in southern British Columbia were most likely tectonically transported from northern California. Future collecting might reveal that Pyropsis has a continuous geologic range from late Turonian to late early Campanian in the northeast Pacific.…”
Section: Paleobiogeography Of Pyropsismentioning
confidence: 97%