2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crevice corrosion kinetics of nickel alloys bearing chromium and molybdenum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure of the critical potential was therefore adopted as the repassivation potential (E rp ) because it provided a measurable, consistent, conservative lower bounding estimate. Rebak and coworkers 31,68,69 have extended these results to crevice corrosion in nickel alloys, attesting to this measurement as a consistent evaluation of a critical potential. A qualitative discussion on how this potential was related to surface concentration at repassivation based on arguments using ohmic drop 21,27,27 as well as mass transport restriction due to pit geometry was proposed in these studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This measure of the critical potential was therefore adopted as the repassivation potential (E rp ) because it provided a measurable, consistent, conservative lower bounding estimate. Rebak and coworkers 31,68,69 have extended these results to crevice corrosion in nickel alloys, attesting to this measurement as a consistent evaluation of a critical potential. A qualitative discussion on how this potential was related to surface concentration at repassivation based on arguments using ohmic drop 21,27,27 as well as mass transport restriction due to pit geometry was proposed in these studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, although E rp is defined as the potential below which no pitting proceeded, the actual measurement of the value depends on a user-specified current density -a value that has ranged from 1 μA/cm 2 to 100 μA/cm 2 . 19,57,59,60,[75][76][77] The value used in the studies by Srinivasan et al [26][27][28]37 (and referred to in this work) was 30 μA/cm 2 , based on current densities similar to those employed by Tsujikawa et al 57,75,76 and Sridhar and coworkers, 19,78 as well as the ASTM G-192 standard. 79 The validity of this specification and its sensitivity to the individual anodic and cathodic kinetics can be examined using Mixed Potential Theory under the constraints of the critical pH condition as shown in the next section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Other studied nickel-based CRAs include the recently developed alloys C-22HS (UNS N07022), HYBRID-BC1 (UNS N10362), 59 (UNS N06059), C-2000 (UNS N06200), etc. [16][17][18][19] Selection of a nickel-based alloy as the material for the corrosion-resistant layer of waste containers for saturated and unsaturated repositories has distinct advantages relative to other metals/alloys: 20,21 • The expected containment is very long, synonymous with low corrosion rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%