Crew Autonomy During Simulated Medical Event Management on Long Duration Space Exploration Missions

Abstract

Objective Our primary aim was to investigate crew performance during medical emergencies with and without ground-support from a flight surgeon located at mission control. Background There are gaps in knowledge regarding the potential for unanticipated in-flight medical events to affect crew health and capacity, and potentially compromise mission success. Additionally, ground support may be impaired or periodically absent during long duration missions. Method We reviewed video recordings of 16 three-person flight crews each managing four unique medical events in a fully immersive spacecraft simulator. Crews were randomized to two conditions: with and without telemedical flight surgeon (FS) support. We assessed differences in technical performance, behavioral skills, and cognitive load between groups. Results Crews with FS support performed better clinically, were rated higher on technical skills, and completed more clinical tasks from the medical checklists than crews without FS support. Crews with FS support also had better behavioral/non-technical skills (information exchange) and reported significantly lower cognitive demand during the medical event scenarios on the NASA-TLX scale, particularly in mental demand and temporal demand. There was no significant difference between groups in time to treat or in objective measures of cognitive demand derived from heart rate variability and electroencephalography. Conclusion Medical checklists are necessary but not sufficient to support high levels of autonomous crew performance in the absence of real-time flight surgeon support Application Potential applications of this research include developing ground-based and in-flight training countermeasures; informing policy regarding autonomous spaceflight, and design of autonomous clinical decision support systems.

3D Bioprinting in Microgravity: Opportunities, Challenges, and Possible Applications in Space

“…In addition, it also implies that injuries considered as less severe on Earth (e.g., wounds, smaller burns, and bone fractures) or even smaller medical events can be inflated in severity and threaten the health of the crew, as well as impact the mission detrimentally. [21][22][23] Therefore, in situ opportunities for medical treatment could tremendously help to support these longterm human exploration missions to the Moon and eventually to Mars.…”

“…Furthermore, these missions will be operationally and logistically very challenging, as they will endure delayed or no premature return scenarios in the case of emergencies, including those that are medically‐related, and will only allow for very limited medical capabilities in‐mission. [ 21,22 ] This differs very strongly from the current modus operandi on the ISS where medical contingencies are treated as first‐aid interventions, but surgeries would be performed on Earth (which would be reachable within less than a day). As such, future deep space missions will need a high self‐sustainability on‐board and a high autonomy of the crew of the mission.…”

The Next Giant Leap for Space Human Factors: The Opportunities

“…Unobtrusive measurement tools will also need to be automatically analyzed to provide timely, actionable data to the crew during communication delays with ground experts. Crews should be alerted to interventions when they are needed during critical and/or time pressured situations such as the medical situations studied by Yule et al (2022). There is much work to be done on the technology to capture the data, the software to integrate and analyze data from multiple data streams, the interface and type of data that will be provided back to the crew, and the data thresholds that will prompt an action or intervention.…”

Human Factors in Spaceflight: New Progress on a Long Journey

“…Communication delays naturally increase the autonomy of the crew in space as they respond to problems in real-time. Yule and colleagues (2023) study of a simulated medical event during communication delays found that delays decrement performance and the enactment of beneficial team behaviors. When considering countermeasures for this type of situation, Mosier and Fischer (2023) examined the challenges of delays with crews in extreme analog environments.…”