1983
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1983)109:3(309)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crew Performance Measurement Via Activity Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Work measurement techniques such as activity sampling and time and motion study is used for calculating task level LP on construction site. Activity sampling is a method in which observations are taken at specified intervals and are not continuous which has been successfully utilized for calculating the labour output in the past [22]. These observations constitute to the sampling of a construction activity.…”
Section: Work Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work measurement techniques such as activity sampling and time and motion study is used for calculating task level LP on construction site. Activity sampling is a method in which observations are taken at specified intervals and are not continuous which has been successfully utilized for calculating the labour output in the past [22]. These observations constitute to the sampling of a construction activity.…”
Section: Work Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(CPMS) (Park et al, 2005); activity/work sampling techniques (Richardson, 1976;Thomas, 1981Thomas, , 1991Thomas and Daily, 1983;Thomas et al, 1984;Liou and Borcherding, 1986;Oglesby et al, 1989); time (or stopwatch) studies (Salvendy, 2001); and questionnaires and surveys (e.g. foreman delay survey and craftsman questionnaire sampling introduced respectively by Tucker et al in 1982, and.…”
Section: Productivity Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the achieved results are discussed and compared with relevant research. It is worthy to note that authors do not intend to estimate the size of crew or machinery for concrete pouring which has been discussed in literature extensively (Thomas and Sakarcan, 1994, Thomas et al, 1984, Thomas and Daily, 1983, Thomas, 1991, Sonmez and Rowings, 1998, Crawford and Vogl, 2006, Borcherding and Alarcon, 1991, Zahraee et al, 2013, Dunlop and Smith, 2004. Beyond the construction sites there are important variables that have not been carefully taken into account for predicting the productivity of concrete pouring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%