1991
DOI: 10.1177/154193129103501708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crewcut - a Tool for Modeling the Effects of High Workload on Human Performance

Abstract: The underlying problem that this work addresses is the incidence of high crew workload in modern systems. The specific problem is that the analysis and prediction of workload during system or procedure design currently involves either 1) the use of human subjects that is very resource consuming or 2) the use of subjective evaluations that are of questionable validity. The innovation we propose is to use computer modeling to predict crew workload. Techniques and supporting technologies are being developed by NA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance, in this case, is computed as (1 -NormalizedExecutionTime), which associates faster implementation times with better performance. As we see from Figure 3, the directive leadership style correlates to faster execution times than the transactional leadership style, but results in higher workload on the human operator, which is perhaps the greatest contributor to human error in many systems [21]. In directive leadership scenarios, a faster execution time is more desired than reducing the workload on the human operator, so directive behavior is more applicable to improving team efficiency.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Performance, in this case, is computed as (1 -NormalizedExecutionTime), which associates faster implementation times with better performance. As we see from Figure 3, the directive leadership style correlates to faster execution times than the transactional leadership style, but results in higher workload on the human operator, which is perhaps the greatest contributor to human error in many systems [21]. In directive leadership scenarios, a faster execution time is more desired than reducing the workload on the human operator, so directive behavior is more applicable to improving team efficiency.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Perhaps the greatest contributor to human error in many systems is the extensive workload placed upon the human operator [8]. Workload studies are used to characterize human performance in terms of total mental demand placed on a person implementing a task.…”
Section: A Scenario Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%