2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02229-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRF and urocortin decreased brain stimulation reward in the rat: reversal by a CRF receptor antagonist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
45
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, extensive previous work with the identical brain stimulation reward procedure used in the present study demonstrated that reward thresholds do not co-vary with response latencies (e.g., Harrison et al 1999;Lin et al 1999Lin et al , 2000Macey et al 2000;Koob 1991, 1992b;Paterson et al 2000). Similarly, the present results also demonstrated a lack of co-variation of threshold elevations with increased response latencies (see Results section and Figure 3 and 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Further, extensive previous work with the identical brain stimulation reward procedure used in the present study demonstrated that reward thresholds do not co-vary with response latencies (e.g., Harrison et al 1999;Lin et al 1999Lin et al , 2000Macey et al 2000;Koob 1991, 1992b;Paterson et al 2000). Similarly, the present results also demonstrated a lack of co-variation of threshold elevations with increased response latencies (see Results section and Figure 3 and 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results help interpret both our ICSS and EPM data, suggesting that in the ICSS paradigm, decreases in maximum response rates were not a result of impaired motor behavior. Injection of the stress hormone, corticotrophin releasing factor, has been reported to increase reward thresholds in ICSS (Macey et al, 2000), suggesting that anxiety alone may induce an anhedonic phenotype. Taken together, these data suggest that the decrease in the total number of entries we observed in the EPM as well as the increased reward threshold and decreased Max Rates observed in ICSS were not artifacts of impaired locomotion and likely due to severe anxiogenesis and anxiety-induced anhedonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we tested the steadydose "binge" cocaine treatment in F334 rats. This moderate dose paradigm (45 mg/kg/day) was chosen for two reasons: (1) stress responsive corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) is a potent neuropeptide that elevates ICSS thresholds in the LH (Macey et al, 2000); and (2) chronic cocaine at this moderate dose decreases CRF gene expression and function in the hypothalamus (Zhou et al, 1996). In the present study, however, LH orexin mRNA level was unaltered after chronic steady-dose cocaine treatment for 14 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%