2017
DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2017.1323637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crime analysis and cognitive effects: the practice of policingthroughflows of data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that the symbolic power of BWCs is an important consideration that requires further investigation. Research on the social shaping of technology illustrates how technology holds a symbolic function as much as it does a technological one (see Chan, 2001;Manning, 2008;Sanders & Condon, 2017). Technology, therefore, is constructed-in its design and in the way it is adopted, appropriated, interpreted, and used (van den Scott, Sanders, & Puddephatt, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that the symbolic power of BWCs is an important consideration that requires further investigation. Research on the social shaping of technology illustrates how technology holds a symbolic function as much as it does a technological one (see Chan, 2001;Manning, 2008;Sanders & Condon, 2017). Technology, therefore, is constructed-in its design and in the way it is adopted, appropriated, interpreted, and used (van den Scott, Sanders, & Puddephatt, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conceptualize this shift as the adoption of an intelligence logic. The article is therefore a contribution to the qualitative scholarly tradition that examines in depth how such changes affect police practice (Brayne, 2017;Burcher & Whelan, 2019;Egbert & Leese, 2021;Fyfe et al, 2018;Innes & Sheptycki, 2004;Innes et al, 2005;Sanders & Condon, 2017;Sanders & Hannem, 2012;Sanders & Henderson, 2013;Sanders et al, 2015;Weston et al, 2019). In this research strand, possibilistic thinking emerges as a prominent police institutional logic, and we will investigate how this is expressed in the organization, with a particular focus on how the intelligence logic is regarded by crime preventers.…”
Section: Context and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It raised concerns linked to the compliance with the Europol's data protection framework, in particular with the principles of purpose limitation, data minimization, data accuracy, storage limitation, with the impact of potential data breaches, location of storage, general management and information security. 28 The EDPS inquiry has shown, among other things, that it is not possible for Europol, receiving large data sets, to ascertain that all the information contained in them comply with data minimization and purpose-limitation principles. The volume of information is so big that its content is often unknown until the moment when the analyst extracts relevant entities for their input into the relevant database in OPS NET.…”
Section: Data Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 of the Law Enforcement Directive 32 27 Ibidem. 28 European Data Protection Supervisor [10]. 29 European Data Protection Supervisor [10], Point 4.7.…”
Section: Data Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%