2011
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2010.528354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crime and arrests: deterrence or resource reallocation?

Abstract: We use monthly time-series data for 20 large US cities to test the deterrence hypothesis (arrests reduce crimes) and the resource reallocation hypothesis (arrests follow from an increase in crime). We find (1) weak support for the deterrence hypothesis, (2) much stronger support for the resource reallocation hypothesis and (3) differences in city-level estimates suggest much heterogeneity in the crime and arrest relationship across regions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rational choice model also predicts that a higher number of police will reduce crimes, either because a greater police presence makes criminal activities less attractive or because more officers on the beat will apprehend more criminals (Garrett and Ott 2011;Tella and Schargrodsky 2004). In this study, the numbers of police in each Mexican state for the sample period are not available.…”
Section: B Deterrence Variablesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The rational choice model also predicts that a higher number of police will reduce crimes, either because a greater police presence makes criminal activities less attractive or because more officers on the beat will apprehend more criminals (Garrett and Ott 2011;Tella and Schargrodsky 2004). In this study, the numbers of police in each Mexican state for the sample period are not available.…”
Section: B Deterrence Variablesmentioning
confidence: 95%