Humiliation and the Exercise of Power in the Florentine Contado in the Mid-Fourteenth-CenturyMedieval historians have long been preoccupied with the relationship between state authority and cultures of violence, as for example in the debates over the identity of the Italian magnates. The last few decades have also seen a turn to understanding violence in terms of emotionality, recognizing that emotional expression could be an aspect of the exercise of power. Gerd Althoff explored this question in terms of how people, particularly rulers, 'staged emotions', using them as a form of ritual communication. 1 One vivid instance is noble anger and violence. Richard Barton argued that nobles in C11th France at times used a show of anger to enforce claims about their prerogatives. 2 A lord might put on a display of affront and rage, to threaten and perhaps seek violent retribution. This contribution builds on the literature on noble anger and the exercise of power by showing its connection with forms of humiliation, drawing on a rich although complex body of sources, mention of emotions in court records. I examine representations of anger and humiliation in mid-fourteenth century denunciations to the Florentine Executor of the Ordinances of Justice. My focus is on three cases in which lords were denounced for the rape and abduction of women. Denouncers to the Executor depicted this in terms of the shame and humiliation of the women's kinsmen. For the denouncers, these abductions and rapes were, in Susan Brownmiller's phrase "messages between men". 3 Of course, the language of the denunciations was very much shaped by cultural and legal categories. I argue that while the three cases probably reflect social experience -elites using anger, sexuality and humiliation to dominate -the denunciations also reveal rhetorical strategies. One example is a denunciation that depicted a noble driven by rage. It survives in the sentences of the criminal court of the Florentine podestà, and was explicitly adjudicated according to the ordinances of Justice. Chele Nutini from San Godenzo, in the Mugello, the region north of Florence, had both denounced and accused Count Guido Domestico, of the Guidi counts, a old feudal family with extensive rural holdings. The Guidi had ceded San Godenzo to Florence in 1344, two years before this case. 4 Chele's accusation was based on this jurisdictional change. He charged that Count Guido through force and violence had unjustly required and burdened him by giving him an order. although he was a free popolano of the city and people of Florence. Count Guido had told him that he must go at his own expense to guard a castrum near the Guidi properties at Romandola, as if he were the count's man, his fidelis. Chele refused to go to the castrum or serve him as a fidelis. Count Guido, "seeing that Chele was amused by his order", "driven by rage" [furore spiritus instigatus] took over fifty of his men to Chele's house. They stole all of his grain, wine, household goods and even his animals. Not content with th...