2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108943109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crime and Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England

Abstract: Arguably, more legal texts survive from pre-Conquest England than from any other early medieval European community. The corpus includes roughly seventy royal law-codes, to which can be added well over a thousand charters, writs, and wills, as well as numerous political tracts, formularies, rituals, and homilies derived from legal sources. These texts offer valuable insight into early English concepts of royal authority and political identity. They reveal both the capacities and limits of the king's regulatory … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they differ in their views of royal power and the degree to which the governing apparatus of pre-Conquest England can be regarded as centralized, both treat pre-Conquest England as a largely functional political community capable of sustaining social hierarchies, redressing crime and other forms of extra-legal violence and preserving a degree of continuity from one generation to the next. It is for this reason that a number of recent studies have sought to take a middle road, recognizing that the crown was supported by a largely stable administrative infrastructure, though one frequently limited by the competing demands of Church, aristocracy and at times even local community (Cubitt, 2007(Cubitt, , 2011Hudson, 2000;Hyams, 2004;Jurasinski, 2015Jurasinski, , 2019Lambert, 2017;Molyneaux, 2015;Rabin, 2007Rabin, , 2020Roach, 2013aRoach, , 2013bRumble, 2013). One might reasonably say that Wormald's thesis has not been so much overturned as moderated.…”
Section: New Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they differ in their views of royal power and the degree to which the governing apparatus of pre-Conquest England can be regarded as centralized, both treat pre-Conquest England as a largely functional political community capable of sustaining social hierarchies, redressing crime and other forms of extra-legal violence and preserving a degree of continuity from one generation to the next. It is for this reason that a number of recent studies have sought to take a middle road, recognizing that the crown was supported by a largely stable administrative infrastructure, though one frequently limited by the competing demands of Church, aristocracy and at times even local community (Cubitt, 2007(Cubitt, , 2011Hudson, 2000;Hyams, 2004;Jurasinski, 2015Jurasinski, , 2019Lambert, 2017;Molyneaux, 2015;Rabin, 2007Rabin, , 2020Roach, 2013aRoach, , 2013bRumble, 2013). One might reasonably say that Wormald's thesis has not been so much overturned as moderated.…”
Section: New Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%