2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511804601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crime Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way of thinking led to the development of several models of policing over the last three decades, whose pertinence is still very much at the fore of research and implementation, regardless of country and political interests (Bolas 2019 ). These include Community Policing (Trojanowicz and Bucqueroux 1998 ; Bayley 1996 ; Fisher-Stewart 2007 ; Hope 1995 ; Lawrence and McCarthy 2013 ; Gill et al 2014 ); Problem-Oriented Policing (Goldstein 1990 ; Weisburd et al 2008 ; Ward 1998 ; Braga 2008 ); Situational Crime Prevention (Sutton et al 2008 ; Rosenbaum et al 1998 ) and Proximity Policing (Brien 2015 ; Bolle 1998 ; Casey 2010 ; Monjardet 1996 ; Jenkins 2013 ). All these models have in common sharing the accountabilities between different actors and the community, although they differ in terms of institutional structures, which are also variable from country to country, influencing the way they are implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way of thinking led to the development of several models of policing over the last three decades, whose pertinence is still very much at the fore of research and implementation, regardless of country and political interests (Bolas 2019 ). These include Community Policing (Trojanowicz and Bucqueroux 1998 ; Bayley 1996 ; Fisher-Stewart 2007 ; Hope 1995 ; Lawrence and McCarthy 2013 ; Gill et al 2014 ); Problem-Oriented Policing (Goldstein 1990 ; Weisburd et al 2008 ; Ward 1998 ; Braga 2008 ); Situational Crime Prevention (Sutton et al 2008 ; Rosenbaum et al 1998 ) and Proximity Policing (Brien 2015 ; Bolle 1998 ; Casey 2010 ; Monjardet 1996 ; Jenkins 2013 ). All these models have in common sharing the accountabilities between different actors and the community, although they differ in terms of institutional structures, which are also variable from country to country, influencing the way they are implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary person-based crime prevention focusses on at-risk groups, individuals and communities that are exposed to crime and disorder. Social and economic factors, such as low educational attainment, unemployment and issues of poor health, are considered the key issues that this type of primary prevention needs to address (Weatherburn, 2004; Hughes, 2007; Sutton et al , 2008). This approach to crime prevention is viewed as giving “much needed attention to the root causes of crime, especially the forces that contribute to delinquency, drug abuse, and a host of related adolescent problems” (Rosenbaum et al , 1998).…”
Section: Contextualising Primary Person-based Crime Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [18] points to feminist criticisms of this theory which include that in cases of family violence it is important for society to change offender motivations rather than the victim"s presence which can be targeted by programs, thus restricting woman"s freedom. But the same authors also commend the theory for taking the focus away from traditional criminal justice responses that only focus on the offender which have only had limited success.…”
Section: B Crime Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [18] divide interventions into primary, secondary and tertiary. The primary interventions target the general population, secondary target at rick populations (both possible offender and victims) and tertiary target known offenders and victims.…”
Section: Approaches/ Typologies To Crime Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation