2015
DOI: 10.4236/me.2015.610106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crime, Self-Protection and Business Growth in Cote d’Ivoire

Abstract: Cote d'Ivoire was considered as an island of stability and economic prosperity in a region of stagnation, and political turmoil. The situation was reversed in the early 2000, when a decade of instability led to a surge in crime and violence. Yet, very little was known about the economic consequences of crime at the firm level. This paper tested empirically the impact of crime on business activity in Cote d'Ivoire. Using a recent World Bank enterprise survey dataset and a Heckman two-step procedure we showed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for the examination of the effects of crime rate on firm performance is mixed at best. Within the context of a developing country, on one hand, crime was found to have a negative association with firm performance by reducing profitability and diverting resources that could be channeled to future investments into security expenditure (Kimou, 2015). BenYishay and Pearlman (2014) found strong evidence to indicate that higher robbery rates reduced the probability of micro-sized businesses to expand their activities, confirming previous findings that enterprises mostly affected by crime being less likely to make any new investments (Krkoska and Robeck, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for the examination of the effects of crime rate on firm performance is mixed at best. Within the context of a developing country, on one hand, crime was found to have a negative association with firm performance by reducing profitability and diverting resources that could be channeled to future investments into security expenditure (Kimou, 2015). BenYishay and Pearlman (2014) found strong evidence to indicate that higher robbery rates reduced the probability of micro-sized businesses to expand their activities, confirming previous findings that enterprises mostly affected by crime being less likely to make any new investments (Krkoska and Robeck, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As a result, greater presence of crime discourages investments, and reduces the competitiveness of firms, thus, creating uncertainty and inefficiency (Kelly, 2000). Kimou (2015) also suggests that increases in crime rates predominantly affects firm profits through reductions in output and increases in the cost of security measures for self-protection. Economic growth may increase employment level, and in turn, it may discourage the pursuit of criminal activities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are heterogeneous across firm size and sectors, with the largest effect on small firms (Montoya 2012). Other studies find that while crime negatively affects firm performance, self-protection is significantly and positively related to sales, but reduces profitability and private investment (Kimou 2015). Crime also acts as a deterrent to firm entry, which can lead to less dynamic industries (Mahofa, Sundaram, and Edwards 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kimou (2015) examined the issue of crime, self-protection, and business performance in Côte d'Ivoire and found that self-protection is positively related to business sales.…”
Section: How Do Firms Respond To Crime?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Private security costs for Caribbean firms were, on average, about 2.6 percent of their annual sales, ranging from 1.5 percent for Guyana to about 6 percent for St. Kitts and Nevis. It is noteworthy that businesses that engage in self-protection enjoy better sales performance, although the costs of self-protection reduce profitability and private investment (Kimou 2015). Taking again the example of The Bahamas to illustrate how these constraints work together, although private costs from crime were high as a percentage of GDP ( Figure 15.6), they are not as significant when examined against annual sales and thus not a sizable concern to most firms (Figure 15.7).…”
Section: Cost Of Crime For Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%