Crimes Against Children: Evaluative Language and News Reports on Sentences

Abstract

This study explores how South African television news reports communicate on sentence proceedings criminal cases involving violent acts against children. These kinds of crimes tend to attract public interest, and the outcomes can be a litmus test on the community's views concerning the justice system. By using cluster criticism to consider the discursive and non-discursive components of selected news reports, the study considers how television news broadcasts use factual and evaluative language and visuals when communicating court outcomes. The paper argues that these broadcasters tend to use evaluative language and visuals, as opposed to factual terms. This tendency can prevent news media from playing the educative role envisaged in the principle of open justice because instead of emphasising the factual aspects of sentencing proceeding, these reports focus on the outcome and the emotive aspects of the cases that entertain rather than educate.

Lived experiences of teachers and students in distance education: shift from traditional to online learning

“…Yet, amidst the promise and potential of online education, challenges emerged, magnified by the exigencies of the pandemic. Technical glitches, the nuanced art of remote communication, and the provision of timely feedback became areas demanding scrutiny [39,40,43]. As education metamorphosed, it became imperative to address these hurdles and pave the way for a seamless transition, ensuring that the promise of online learning was fully realized [50].…”