Criminal Business Relationships Between Commodity Regions and Industrialized Countries: The Hard Road From Raw Material to New Technology

Abstract

Extractive industries often cause serious environmental harm, and even social harm, to the local populations of the commodity regions, especially in the Global South. The increasing demand and extraction of raw materials needed for the production of new technologies in the Global North is a specific case of this, which emphasizes asymmetrical global economic conditions. This article describes these harmful commodity relationships and presents the meaning behind the increase in the demand for and production of raw materials. The case of lithium is offered as an example of this development. Further, in the article, it is suggested that the lack of regulation and control promotes a series of deviant and criminal practices which can be systematically organized for criminological analysis. The harm caused by this industry, by its part, is presented as well, as well as a first categorization of its impact on the local population even in terms of human rights violations. Instead of a conclusion, an invitation to the study of these renewed forms of exploitation and victimization is made to criminologists, and especially, to criminologists from the particular regions that benefit from the development of new, innovative “clean” technologies.

Corporate Crime and the Use of Science in the Case of Asbestos: Producing Harm Through Discursive Shields

“…This aligns with the most well-known literature in green criminology and in white collar crime (Hall, 2018; Natali, 2015). Ambiguities are permanently found in these studies, in regard to the workplace (Tombs, 2005, p. 41) and the living territory (Böhm, 2020; Natali & Budó, 2019). The construction of victimization in this theme also dialogues with those described fields, as it is not interpersonally provoked, and may be geographically or temporarily distant from the action, as part of an ongoing process (Whyte, 2018).…”

“…The migration of harms through externalizing risk, disease, and violence (Böhm, 2020) is accompanied by a migration of ways of thinking about the risks and the harms that are constructed through scientific discourses (Castleman, 1995). Because asbestos is an industrial cause of widespread injury, the examination of all its dimensions provides a salient illustration of the crimes of the powerful worldwide.…”

Toward a Criminological Understanding of Financialization

“…The first empirical research addressing the criminogenic setting of such institutions was provided by Friedrichs and Friedrichs (2002), who introduced the category of crimes of globalization to explain the harm caused by the World Bank's financing of a dam in Thailand. 1 Since then, the concept has been deployed in a number of studies that connect globalization to the production of grave human rights violations and social and environmental harms through policies and practices of financial institutions (cf, among others, Aas 2013;Böhm 2020;Ezeonu 2008;Rothe et al 2006;Wright and Muzzatti 2007).…”

Toxic Colonialism in the Territorial Isles: A Geospatial Analysis of Environmental Crime Across U.S. Territorial Islands 2013–2017

“…The incomplete decolonization and lack of sovereignty which characterize the U.S territories today render the ability of island states’ to assert control over the protection of their environment difficult. This lack of regulation promotes a series of deviant and criminal human rights violations along asymmetrical lines displacing entire populations (Böhm, 2020). Palau, in particular, has vigorously attempted to prevent vessels with nuclear arms to enter its port.…”