1995
DOI: 10.2307/2096316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criminal Careers in the Short-Term: Intra-Individual Variability in Crime and Its Relation to Local Life Circumstances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

30
703
5
23

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 778 publications
(761 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
30
703
5
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have examined Sampson and Laub's stability/change thesis and report results consistent with their view that both persistent individual differences (stability) and local life circumstances (change) are important for understanding offending over the life-course (Blokland and Nieuwbeerta 2005;Horney et al 1995;Laub and Sampson 2003;Paternoster et al 1997;Piquero et al 2002a). It is also important to note that studies have also shown that the type and quality of life circumstances and not just the mere presence of it, is important for aiding the desistance process (Laub et al 1998).…”
Section: Theory Informed By Criminal Careers Researchmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Several studies have examined Sampson and Laub's stability/change thesis and report results consistent with their view that both persistent individual differences (stability) and local life circumstances (change) are important for understanding offending over the life-course (Blokland and Nieuwbeerta 2005;Horney et al 1995;Laub and Sampson 2003;Paternoster et al 1997;Piquero et al 2002a). It is also important to note that studies have also shown that the type and quality of life circumstances and not just the mere presence of it, is important for aiding the desistance process (Laub et al 1998).…”
Section: Theory Informed By Criminal Careers Researchmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Findings elsewhere suggest that alcohol impacts on within individual variation in antisocial behaviour, including violent behaviour (see Farrington 1995;Hussong et al 2004) and shortterm changes in alcohol consumption have been identified as having proximal influence on the likelihood of violent behaviour (Horney et al 1995), even when controlling for anti-social personality (Falls-Stewart et al 2003). Such findings support, at least in part, the theory that alcohol intoxication facilitates violence via its psychopharmacologic effects on cognitive processing or expectancies associated with intoxication (Falls-Stewart et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Gottfredson and Hirschi 1990). This view implies that life events after childhood are of little, if any, explanatory importance H et al 1995:655) and denies substantial changes in offending over the life-course, such as those found by Sampson and Laub (1993) (Horney et al 1995). Whilst this reasoning is plausible, it is equally plausible that alcohol consumption also has a specific influence on outcomes in adolescence and early adulthood, in addition to the common influence of problem behaviour (Duncan et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, however, the GCM is a residual model, meaning that the random effects summarize what is left rather than control for unobserved heterogeneity. Individuals interested in controlling for individual differences have to take the additional step of decomposing the time-varying covariates into between individual and within individual terms as done in Horney et al (1995). The GCM will provide results that are very similar to what can be achieved through a fixed effect panel model.…”
Section: How Are Methods For Trajectories Applied?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These approaches move beyond fixed effect or random effect approaches that only seek to control for stable fixed effects when studying the impact of time-varying covariates. 5 Prominent examples of the use of GCM for this purpose include the study of marriage and work by Horney et al (1995) and Laub and Sampson (2003). In reality, however, the GCM is a residual model, meaning that the random effects summarize what is left rather than control for unobserved heterogeneity.…”
Section: How Are Methods For Trajectories Applied?mentioning
confidence: 99%