2022
DOI: 10.1177/00111287221130959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criminal Thinking in a Sample of Men and Women Attending a Multi-Site Batterer Intervention Program

Abstract: The study investigated differences and similarities in criminal thinking between men and women attending a multi-site Batterer Intervention Program (BIP). Overall, rates of criminal thinking were low. However, the results of the multivariate analyses suggest that, after controlling for demographic characteristics (i.e., race, ethnicity, education, SES) and personal experiences (i.e., prior convictions, mental health problems, substance abuse, experience of abuse) female participants significantly differed from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women who are convicted of DV crimes in cases of IPV often also attend DVIPs, as do individuals convicted of DV crimes in cases of family violence (Mills et al, 2013), and a gender-neutral approach to DVIP has become common (Solinas-Saunders, & Stacer, 2022). Yet, the long-standing debate in the field as to whether programs should be implemented equally for all those mandated to treatment for a DV crime or should address gender differences remains ongoing (Solinas-Saunders, & Stacer, 2022).…”
Section: Using Intervention Programs For Ipvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women who are convicted of DV crimes in cases of IPV often also attend DVIPs, as do individuals convicted of DV crimes in cases of family violence (Mills et al, 2013), and a gender-neutral approach to DVIP has become common (Solinas-Saunders, & Stacer, 2022). Yet, the long-standing debate in the field as to whether programs should be implemented equally for all those mandated to treatment for a DV crime or should address gender differences remains ongoing (Solinas-Saunders, & Stacer, 2022).…”
Section: Using Intervention Programs For Ipvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model provides guidance in shifting attitudes concerning the unequal distribution of power and control between genders, particularly in relation to IPV, thereby aiming to educate men in recognizing maladaptive behaviors and discovering nonviolent alternatives (Herman et al, 2014). Women who are convicted of DV crimes in cases of IPV often also attend DVIPs, as do individuals convicted of DV crimes in cases of family violence (Mills et al, 2013), and a gender-neutral approach to DVIP has become common (Solinas-Saunders, & Stacer, 2022). Yet, the long-standing debate in the field as to whether programs should be implemented equally for all those mandated to treatment for a DV crime or should address gender differences remains ongoing (Solinas-Saunders, & Stacer, 2022).…”
Section: Using Intervention Programs For Ipvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past 30 years witnessed a rise in the number of women arrested for domestic violence following implementation of mandatory arrest policies ( Chesney-Lind, 2002 ; Durfee, 2012 ; Henning et al, 2006 ). Women represent as many as 31% of all domestic violence arrests in some jurisdictions which has contributed to their increasing visibility in batterer intervention programs ( Hamel et al, 2017 ; Hirschel & Buzawa, 2002 ; Solinas-Saunders & Stacer, 2022 ). Women now comprise up to 25% of batterer intervention program participants, with comparable or more frequent psychological and physical intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration being reported by women relative to men enrolled in batterer interventions ( Busch & Rosenberg, 2004 ; Buttell et al, 2012 ; Dalton, 2007 ; Elmquist et al, 2014 ; Feder & Henning, 2005 ; Hamel et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%