Criminology and Criminal Justice Doctoral Programs in 2012–2013: Transformation of a Male-Dominated Arena

Carlan, Philip E.; Thompson, R. Alan; Cheeseman, Kelly

doi:10.1080/10511253.2013.827228

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, they reflect an important, albeit partial, sample of research‐intensive organisations where criminological discourses and knowledge claims are produced 5 . Both the sample size and the kinds of institutions included are consistent with extant studies that examine other metrics and features of the criminological labour force (see Carlan, Lewis and Cheeseman Dial 2009; Carlan, Thompson and Cheeseman 2013; Greene, Gabbidon and Wilson 2018; Kleck and Mims 2017).…”

Section: Methodssupporting

confidence: 74%

“…Observer identification might sound like a straightforward process of assigning categories to visual data. While there is precedent for using observer identification in criminological research (Carlan, Lewis and Cheeseman Dial 2009; Carlan, Thompson and Cheeeseman 2013; Greene, Gabbidon and Wilson 2018; Kleck and Mims 2017), there are issues of both measurement and ethics when using observer identification to categorise other human beings, especially when imposing labels of racial, ethnic and gendered identities.…”

Section: Ethics Of Observer Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One cannot claim that race is sociopolitically made (as opposed to being objectively found) and then fail to articulate how racial categories were created in this study. Though there are those who use this same approach (Carlan, Thompson and Cheeeseman 2013; Greene, Gabbidon and Wilson 2018), this is the first criminological study to explicitly problematise the method in the context of race and ethnicity 9…”

Section: Ethics Of Observer Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…99In the Carlan, Thompson and Cheeseman (2013) study, for example, the researchers asked individuals and administrative chairs to report the gender and race of faculty members who were not discernible via ‘institutional websites and general internet sites’ (p.581). The present article provides contextual information on the structural practice (and pitfalls) of using observer identification in this way.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Critical Criminology and Race: Re‐examining the Whiteness of US Criminological Thought

León

2021

Howard J Crime Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Race and racism are defining features of criminal justice systems in the United States. Race is also a defining feature of criminological theory. There have been robust efforts to address racism within theories and institutional practices pertaining to crime, law, and institutions of formal social control, but whiteness remains at the core of criminological knowledge production. The current article provides empirical support for showing how whiteness conditions the academic discourses of criminology and criminal justice (CCJ) in the United States. CCJ research plays an important role in discussions of racial justice and public policy. By studying the racialised (that is, white) nature of the CCJ research industry, we can better understand where critical criminology ‘fits’ in the broader struggle for social, racial and epistemological justice.

show abstract

Section: Methodssupporting

confidence: 74%

Section: Ethics Of Observer Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ethics Of Observer Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Critical Criminology and Race: Re‐examining the Whiteness of US Criminological Thought

León

2021

Howard J Crime Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further, in our field, in particular, it is not the norm for women to be in leadership positions. For example, across the top Ph.D. programs in the US, the average percentage of women tenured or tenure-track is about 36% and drops to 32% for the top ten programs (Carlan, Thompson & Cheeseman, 2013).…”

Section: A Divided Frontmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Test of Leadership: Insight from Two Women from the Founding CrimCon Board

Antunes

Boppre

2021

Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice &Amp; Criminology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We write this commentary as two former members of the founding Criminology Consortium (CrimCon) board. In this essay, we share our gendered experiences with respect to the board's role in Reinhard, Stafford, and Payne's (2021) article, "COVID-19 and academia: Considering the future of academic conferencing." The paper's thirdauthor, Payne, was on the board with us, and remains on it as we write. We will discuss issues with the study process and conclusions. We wish to share our perspectives on the board to inform future leadership and efforts towards public scholarship within criminology.

show abstract

An Examination of Author Characteristics in National and Regional Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals, 2008–2010: Are Female Scholars Changing the Nature of Publishing in Criminology and Criminal Justice?

Crow

Smykla

2014

Am J Crim Just

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Criminology and Criminal Justice Doctoral Programs in 2012–2013: Transformation of a Male-Dominated Arena

Cited by 7 publications

References 13 publications

Critical Criminology and Race: Re‐examining the Whiteness of US Criminological Thought

Critical Criminology and Race: Re‐examining the Whiteness of US Criminological Thought

A Test of Leadership: Insight from Two Women from the Founding CrimCon Board

An Examination of Author Characteristics in National and Regional Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals, 2008–2010: Are Female Scholars Changing the Nature of Publishing in Criminology and Criminal Justice?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About