“…In this context, criminology teaching and research developed in post-reform China ‘under the watchful eye’ of the Chinese Communist Party; ‘the study of crime had to support, rather than embarrass, the party and the state’ (Hebenton and Jou, 2010: 12–13). The varied use of ‘ideological pressure’, ‘research regulation’ and ‘organisational steering’ and institutionalization of criminology as ‘a subfield of law’ (Hebenton and Jou, 2010: 13–14) in criminal law schools and university curricula has shaped the discipline’s dominant theoretical approaches, research topics and methods. Located as ‘a legal science’, criminology curricular development in China has resulted in ‘a shortage of key evaluation and social science research skills’ (Hebenton and Jou, 2010: 16), restricted its extension into related fields of social inquiry and public policy and its links with other social science disciplines.…”