2019
DOI: 10.24921/2019.94115941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified?

Abstract: The present work has been carefully prepared. Nevertheless, the author and the publisher assume no liability for the accuracy of information and instructions as well as for any misprints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…U.S. crises may divided into four central divisions of grievances against the A.B. consisting of (1) the Procedural approach of A.B., (2) The substantive approach, (3) excessive judicial activism, (4) Failure to meet the 90-day deadline 19…”
Section: Lla-2024-477mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…U.S. crises may divided into four central divisions of grievances against the A.B. consisting of (1) the Procedural approach of A.B., (2) The substantive approach, (3) excessive judicial activism, (4) Failure to meet the 90-day deadline 19…”
Section: Lla-2024-477mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The Dispute Settlement Body, "Negotiations on Improvements and Clarifications of the Dispute Settlement Understanding" Communication from the USA, 21 Oct, (2005). 19 Amrita Bahri, "Appellate Body Held Hostage": Is Judicial Activism at Fair Trial? ", Journal of World Trade, (2019).…”
Section: A Procedural Approach Of the Wto Appellate Body's Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El sistema de solución de diferencias de la Organización Mundial del Comercio (OMC) enfrenta la mayor crisis desde su origen en 1995. En lo que pudiere ser el fin del sistema basado en normas (Brewster, 2019;Patch, 2019), Estados Unidos ha obstruido el nombramiento para las vacantes en el Órgano de Apelación (OA) de la OMC (Lehne, 2019;Bäumler, 2020), el que, por tanto, no ha podido funcionar efectivamente desde diciembre de 2019. Por lo anterior, las apelaciones quedarán pendientes y el Órgano de Solución de Diferencias (OSD) de la OMC no podrá adoptar el informe del grupo especial, con arreglo al artículo 16.4 del Entendimiento de la OMC relativo a las normas y procedimientos por los que se rige la solución de diferencias (comúnmente denominado Entendimiento sobre Solución de Diferencias [ESD]). Por tanto, el informe del grupo especial no será vinculante y las partes no podrán exigir su cumplimiento.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified