2021
DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2021.1879098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis Interventions in Schools: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion of the results reveals that the most widely used intervention models in the pre-professional practicums of Social Work at the Technical University of Manabí are Case Management, Crisis Intervention, and Behavior Modification. (17) This is because these approaches are geared towards resolving concrete social problems and allow for practical results to be obtained in the short term, as suggested by Lake et al (18) . It also coincides with the views expressed by Schott et al (19) who indicate that these models, focused on the internal and subjective processes of individuals, require a more prolonged intervention time, which hinders their application in practicum contexts with limited schedules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion of the results reveals that the most widely used intervention models in the pre-professional practicums of Social Work at the Technical University of Manabí are Case Management, Crisis Intervention, and Behavior Modification. (17) This is because these approaches are geared towards resolving concrete social problems and allow for practical results to be obtained in the short term, as suggested by Lake et al (18) . It also coincides with the views expressed by Schott et al (19) who indicate that these models, focused on the internal and subjective processes of individuals, require a more prolonged intervention time, which hinders their application in practicum contexts with limited schedules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal classroom intervention should be evaluated through psychoeducational, developmental, or positive psychological tools, while clinical scales and relative thresholds should be used for Tier 2 or Tier 3 interventions (Chafouleas et al, 2016; Rickwood, 2012). Sokol et al (2021) suggested that it is unfeasible and perhaps even unethical to incorporate a Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) design that would exclude parts of the population from the expected benefits when applying a universal school-based intervention in times of a crisis. Our review revealed confusion between the universal level of the intervention and the clinical evaluation employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of school-based universal crisis intervention is also important at an institutional level. First, at the time of crisis, the design and implementation of any intervention often require a significant amount of time and resources, mainly from those who are already tasked with managing the emergency (Sokol et al, 2021). Therefore, the analysis of extant programmes and related key methodological and psychoeducational factors can help schools and communities to gather ideas for activities, while the school staff can concentrate on adapting them to suit their context and culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consultation, assessment, referral, and education teams are able to more quickly identify and assess student needs and generate interventions to support students at the school, community, and family levels (Bates et al, 2019). School crisis response teams, most commonly composed of administrators, school-based mental health providers, school-based medical personnel, support staff, and educators, address a variety of crises or traumatic events within the school environment (Sokol et al, 2021). Another interprofessional school-leadership team approach, the Integrated Comprehensive Systems for Equity framework, utilizes teams to address systemic inequities to meet student needs (Weiler & Hinnant-Crawford, 2021).…”
Section: Tltsmentioning
confidence: 99%