1994
DOI: 10.1108/09653569410795632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis Management and Management Strategy‐Time to “Loop the Loop”?

Abstract: Examines a progression of theoretical and practical approaches to the job of strategic leadership and explains why these approaches are both managers and creators of increasingly chaotic and dangerous organizational/societal situations. Argues that a new paradigm for management strategy is required‐one which underpins behaviour of opposing dimensions to the existing mainstream paradigm for management but which also harnesses beneficial aspects of the traditional paradigm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently by drawing on the knowledge of individuals and groups derived from their experiences of managing in a crisis, the role of organisational learning is stressed. In considering learning approaches in relation to crisis management Richardson (1994) distinguishes between single and double loop learning. Single loop learning concerns learning from the managerial responses themselves in keeping with the accepted framework of existing systems' objectives and roles, whereas double loop learning additionally questions the systems, roles and objectives themselves as well as the response to the crisis to see what lessons might be forthcoming.…”
Section: N Evans and S Elphickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently by drawing on the knowledge of individuals and groups derived from their experiences of managing in a crisis, the role of organisational learning is stressed. In considering learning approaches in relation to crisis management Richardson (1994) distinguishes between single and double loop learning. Single loop learning concerns learning from the managerial responses themselves in keeping with the accepted framework of existing systems' objectives and roles, whereas double loop learning additionally questions the systems, roles and objectives themselves as well as the response to the crisis to see what lessons might be forthcoming.…”
Section: N Evans and S Elphickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other crisis management research has focussed on the stages of crises to assist in understanding crisis phenomenon and assist in proactive and strategic management of crises (see Richardson, 1994;1995). Fink (1986) and Roberts (1994) both developed slightly different models to explain the lifecycle of crises (see table 2).…”
Section: Crisis Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45-46), Kraus & Becker-Kolle (2004: pp. 15-16), Lymbersky (2013), Mitroff, Pauchant & Shrivastava (2006: p. 51), Müller (1986), Pate (1999: p. 55), Pümpin & Prange (1995: p. 201), Richardson (1994), Slatter (1987Slatter ( : pp. 25-55, 1990), Schellberg (2008: p. 57), Wildemann (2004: p. 193).…”
Section: Causes As the Real Culprits Of The Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%