A Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) is one of the main pillars of the Banking Union project. The notes in this compilation examine options for a possible future design of a SRM in more detail and put this mechanism into a broader context.
IP/A/ECON/NT
LINGUISTIC VERSIONS
Original: EN
ABOUT THE EDITORTo contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: poldep-economy-science@ep.europa.euManuscript completed in March 2013. Brussels, © European Union, 2013.This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies
DISCLAIMERThe opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. The three notes in this compilation describe various options for a Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) in more detail and put the mechanism into a broader context. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/134353.pdf.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
5The Commission proposals for a single supervisory mechanism can be found on the following webpage: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/banking-union/index_en.htm.
NOTE AbstractThe European Council has outlined the creation of a Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) complementing the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The thinking on the legal basis, design and missions of the SRM is still at an early stage and depends on important other initiatives, including the European Stability Mechanism's involvement in direct bank recapitalisations and the Bank Recovery and Resolution (BRR) Directive. The SRM should also not be seen as the final step creating Europe's future banking union.Both the BRR Directive and the SRM should be designed to enable substantial financial participation of existing creditors in future bank restructurings. To be effective, the SRM should empower a central body. However, in the absence of Treaty change and of further fiscal integration, SRM decisions will need to be implemented through national resolution regimes. The central body of the SRM should be either the European Commission, or a new authority.This legislative effort should not be taken as an excuse to delay decisive action on the management and resolution of the current European banking fragility, which imposes a major drag on Europe's growth and employment. . We also identify an implicit fourth step of completing a sustainable banking union, which unlike the first three will require treaty changes and deeper fiscal and political integration, and may include a European insolvency regime, a European resolution regime, and a more integrated fiscal and deposit insurance framework supported by enhanced democratic accountability.Implementing this sequence will involve a complex balancing of...