Crisis spillover of corporate environmental misconducts: The roles of perceived similarity, familiarity, and corporate environmental responsibility in determining the impact on oppositional behavioral intention

Abstract

Negative impact of a firm's environmental misconduct can spread to other firms under the same category due to stakeholders' categorization. Such problem implies a sociocognitive process that has yet to be explored. Therefore, this study extends the current literature by exploring how interfirm similarity affects the spillover effects through stakeholders' engagement. We propose that interfirm similarity can be perceived by stakeholders as a categorization standard, which can lead to their opposition to other firms. Spillover of misconduct is caused by the decreasing stakeholders' trust, wherein the negative effect is contingent upon stakeholders' perceptions. A questionnaire study is conducted to investigate how people resist an innocent firm in China when a chemistry firm experienced an explosion accident. Our findings confirm that interfirm similarity increases stakeholders' opposition to the innocent firm by decreasing their trust. However, the negative effect is alleviated when the innocent firm is perceived as highly environmentally responsible. Our work contributes to the crisis spillover literature and carries important implications for the management of innocent firms that may lose from an industry peer's misconduct. K E Y W O R D S corporate environmental responsibility, general familiarity, interfirm similarity, oppositional behavioral intention, trust

The contagion effect of environmental violations: The case of Dieselgate in Germany

“…), as well as positioning strategy (high‐end vs. low‐end orientation). Ouyang, Yao, and Hu (2020) specified this finding for the context of environmental misconduct and illustrated that stakeholders tend to categorize firms by similarity. Looking at the case of Dieselgate, most of the crisis contagion criteria fit German car manufacturers.…”

Spatial Dynamics between Firm Sales and Environmental Responsibility: The Mediating Role of Corporate Innovation

“…Moreover, there are frequent spatial dependencies and strategic interactions of CER practices between neighboring companies [12]. A positive spatial spillover effect may exist in CER practices [13]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this has been ignored in the CER literature.…”

Public Administration and Values Oriented to Sustainability: A Systematic Approach to the Literature

“…Around 26.7% of studies address the economic dimension in this period, highlighting the topics of performance [93][94][95], innovation [96,97], entrepreneurship [98], competitiveness [99,100], supply chains [101][102][103], and others. In the last decade, the environmental dimension (24.48%) reflects topics such as water management [104], sustainable policies [105][106][107], adaptation to climate change [108][109][110], eco-tourism [111,112], environmental responsibility [113,114], sustainable development [115][116][117], and the circular economy [118,119]. adaptation to climate change [108][109][110], eco-tourism [111,112], environmental responsibility [113,114], sustainable development [115][116][117], and the circular economy [118,119].…”