INTRODUCTION. Cell therapies and tissue-engineered products are aimed at patients with severe conditions (genetic and neurodegenerative disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal injuries, burns, etc.) that lack alternative treatment options. Analysis of clinical efficacy data on cellbased medicinal products is important for understanding their translational potential in personalised medicine.AIM. This study aimed to review key trends in cell therapy, analyse data on approved cell therapies and tissue-engineered products, and assess challenges and prospects for their use.DISCUSSION. This article analyses data on the composition of cell therapies and tissue-engineered products, indications for their use, and the results of clinical studies. Cell-based medicinal products are derived from autologous or allogeneic mesenchymal and limbal stem cells, epithelial cells, chondrocytes, native or genetically engineered haematopoietic stem cells, genetically engineered lymphocytes (CAR-T, CAR-NK), etc. Medicinal products based on cell technologies have been approved in many countries, including the USA (approximately 30), the European Union (approximately 20), Japan (18), South Korea (15), etc. As of today, two cell therapies have been granted marketing authorisation in the Russian Federation. The first is based on CAR-T cells (a gene therapy product), and the other is based on chondrocytes (a cell-based medicinal product); the latter has been developed in Russia. The main advantages of cell therapy products include higher efficacy and fewer adverse drug reactions in comparison with standard treatment modalities. The main challenges of cell therapy include the risks of immune reactions and mutagenesis associated with lentiviral vectors or CRISPR/Cas9 technology, as well as limited efficacy of CAR-T and CAR-NK cells due to immunosuppressive properties of tumour microenvironment.CONCLUSIONS. In comparison with conventional treatment approaches, the use of cell therapies and tissue-engineered products can help effectively eliminate defects in various body tissues, avoid highly invasive surgical interventions, and reduce regeneration time. Thus, ensuring development of similar but at the same time more affordable Russian medicinal products can bring great benefits for the healthcare system of the Russian Federation.