2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0501-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR-Cas9 mediated targeted disruption of FAD2–2 microsomal omega-6 desaturase in soybean (Glycine max.L)

Abstract: BackgroundRecent innovation in the field of genome engineering encompasses numerous levels of plant genome engineering which attract the substantial excitement of plant biologist worldwide. RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 system has appeared a promising tool in site-directed mutagenesis due to its innovative utilization in different branches of biology. CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease system have supersedes all previously existed strategies and their associated pitfalls encountered with site-specific mutagenesis.Results Here we d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, transgenesis of FAD3 or DREB2C resulted in elevated 18:3 content and ameliorated multistress resistance (Shi et al, 2018;. Interestingly, to achieve high 18:1 level that is good for oil stability and human health, FAD2 has become a hotspot for targeted disruption by using CRISPR/Cas9, the powerful genome editing tool (Abe et al, 2018;Okuzaki et al, 2018;al Amin et al, 2019;Do et al, 2019). Nevertheless, crop improvement would be facilitated if the culture conditions involving light, temperature, fertilizers, and exogenous phytohormones are optimized for UFA synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, transgenesis of FAD3 or DREB2C resulted in elevated 18:3 content and ameliorated multistress resistance (Shi et al, 2018;. Interestingly, to achieve high 18:1 level that is good for oil stability and human health, FAD2 has become a hotspot for targeted disruption by using CRISPR/Cas9, the powerful genome editing tool (Abe et al, 2018;Okuzaki et al, 2018;al Amin et al, 2019;Do et al, 2019). Nevertheless, crop improvement would be facilitated if the culture conditions involving light, temperature, fertilizers, and exogenous phytohormones are optimized for UFA synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, soybeans containing low amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids, LA and ALA, which are easily oxidized, and high oleic acid content, which is stable to oxidation at high temperatures, have been developed using genetic engineering or mutant breeding methods (Buhr et al, 2002;Graef et al, 2009;Pham et al, 2010;Pham et al, 2012). The genome editing method with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 was recently used to knockout the soybean FAD2-2 gene to achieve better production of oleic acid (Al Amin et al, 2019). However, soybean is used as a health functional food in the form of soymilk in Korea and East Asia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the oil and protein content of soybean seed has been a task for breeders to meet the demand of the rapidly growing human population and the rising concern of food shortage (El-Hamidi and Zaher, 2018). Both quantity and quality are important factors to improve soybean oil production (Al Amin et al, 2019;Kanai et al, 2019). The fatty acids in soybean seed oil include palmitic acid (11%), stearic acid (4%), oleic acid (23%), linoleic acid (LA) (54%), and a-linolenic acid (ALA) (8%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this approach initially yields plants bearing foreign DNA, the transgene is unlinked to the edit and can thus be segregated out (or removed via the use of associated "suicide" genes expressed in pollen or embryos) while maintaining the targeted edit (He et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018a;Yang et al, 2017a). In oilseed species such as canola, camelina, and soybean, CRISPR/Cas-mediated editing frequencies (the proportion of transgenic plants bearing an edit) ranging from 0 to 100% have been reported in the first generation when the editing machinery was introduced as a stable transgenic cassette (e.g., Al Amin et al, 2019;Aznar-Moreno and Durrett, 2017;Braatz et al, 2017;Morineau et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2018). This high level of variation likely results from differences in the target site, nature of the sgRNA, transformation method, promoters used to drive Cas and sgRNA expression, and the background vector (Ma et al, 2015;Mikami et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2017aYang et al, , 2018.…”
Section: The Genome Editing Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%