2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tissue-specific knockout and cDNA rescue using sgRNAs that target exon-intron junctions in Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A closer look at these deletions showed that most of them encompassed all three target sites. Our analysis illustrates the advantage of applying multiplexed gRNA with the 100% efficiency (this study) compared to single gRNA with the reported 23% efficiency of mutagenesis [ 33 ]. Taken together, the sequencing data and the lethal phenotype of the tub-Cas9 > RNZ KO larvae, support the expectation that multiple gRNAs targeting the same locus within a few hundred base pairs from each other produce large deficiencies resulting in knockout mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A closer look at these deletions showed that most of them encompassed all three target sites. Our analysis illustrates the advantage of applying multiplexed gRNA with the 100% efficiency (this study) compared to single gRNA with the reported 23% efficiency of mutagenesis [ 33 ]. Taken together, the sequencing data and the lethal phenotype of the tub-Cas9 > RNZ KO larvae, support the expectation that multiple gRNAs targeting the same locus within a few hundred base pairs from each other produce large deficiencies resulting in knockout mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To assess the cell autonomous action of RNase Z variants, we developed a new approach of spatially restricted mutagenesis that coupled tissue-specific CRISPR-Cas9 mediated KO with transgenic rescue. A similar protocol was recently proposed by Chilian and co-authors [ 33 ]. An important distinguishing feature of our approach is that instead of Gal4/UAS overexpression as a rescue system, we supply disease-associated protein variants in amounts defined by the activity of the natural RNase Z promoter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the effects of the variants in a tissue-specific manner, we decided to use a recently-developed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated system that permits both tissue-specific dOgdh knockout and rescue by dOgdh cDNA. 28 , 31 We designed a gRNA that is complementary to the exon-intron junction of dOgdh and created transgenic flies carrying this gRNA under the control of U6:3 promoter ( U6:3-gRNA dOgdh ). The U6:3 promoter leads to ubiquitous expression of the gRNA dOgdh .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most viral infection models in flies are not focused on neurological outcomes. Nonetheless, novel approaches in genetic manipulation [ 159 ], behavioural assessment (automated monitoring systems [ 160 ]) and neuropathology (FlyClear tissue clearing protocols [ 161 ]) are expanding experimental design beyond the conventional readouts used to profile neuroinfection and immunity outcomes in flies ( Figure 1 ). Below, we will highlight examples of the benefits and drawbacks of using virus-infected Drosophila to study related neurological sequelae.…”
Section: Neuroinfection and Neuroimmunity Models In Drosophilamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most viral transgenic models seek to insert novel viral protein genes into the fly genome to study viral pathology, CRISPR technology also allows for selective addition or removal of genes, even in existing GAL4/UAS models [ 159 ]. This approach has been used in flies to selectively knock-out genes in neural tissues and perform rescue experiments, through UAS-controlled Cas9 expression in conjunction with specific guide-RNAs [ 159 ]. CRISPR technology has also been used to ablate the expression of viral transposable elements in mammalian genomes [ 198 ], although this approach has not yet been used in flies.…”
Section: Neuroinfection and Neuroimmunity Models In Drosophilamentioning
confidence: 99%