2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0077-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR interference-based specific and efficient gene inactivation in the brain

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas9 has been demonstrated to delete genes in postmitotic neurons. Compared to the establishment of proliferative cell lines or animal strains, it is more challenging to acquire a highly homogeneous consequence of gene editing in a stable neural network. Here we show that dCas9-based CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) can efficiently silence genes in neurons. Using a pseudotarget fishing strategy, we demonstrate that CRISPRi shows superior targeting specificity without detectable off-target activity. Further… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epigenetic editing in brain has seen major advances in its application to gene activation and silencing (Lee et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2018). For example, targeted dCas9-Tet1 to CGG repeats in gene fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) is sufficient to reverse the hypermethylation at this locus and sustain expression of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) in edited neurons .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenetic editing in brain has seen major advances in its application to gene activation and silencing (Lee et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2018). For example, targeted dCas9-Tet1 to CGG repeats in gene fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) is sufficient to reverse the hypermethylation at this locus and sustain expression of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) in edited neurons .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cas9 has already been delivered with AAV in rodents and has been shown to induce a mild cellular response, but this has not been reported in the brain (Chew et al, 2016). CRISPRa is, in principle, less likely to have deleterious off-target effects than CRISPR gene editing because it does not cleave DNA (La Russa and Qi, 2015;Zheng et al, 2018), but further research is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egr3 Egr2 log2(Fold change) Target/LacZ log2(Fold change) Dopaplex/LacZ enabled rapid and multiplexable transcriptional control in the mammalian central nervous system, providing an avenue to investigate how gene programs regulate normal and maladaptive brain states (35,(42)(43)(44). To simultaneously activate multiple genes in this DA-induced gene expression profile, we harnessed a neuron-optimized CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) system ( Fig.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%