2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2627-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPRDetect: A flexible algorithm to define CRISPR arrays

Abstract: BackgroundCRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) RNAs provide the specificity for noncoding RNA-guided adaptive immune defence systems in prokaryotes. CRISPR arrays consist of repeat sequences separated by specific spacer sequences. CRISPR arrays have previously been identified in a large proportion of prokaryotic genomes. However, currently available detection algorithms do not utilise recently discovered features regarding CRISPR loci.ResultsWe have developed a new approach to aut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
245
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
245
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Type-IIA CRISPR arrays were identified within individual genomes using CRISPRfinder (Grissa et al, 2007) or CRISPRDetect (Biswas et al, 2016) web utilities. See Figure S1B for a representative L. monocytogenes type II-A CRISPR array.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type-IIA CRISPR arrays were identified within individual genomes using CRISPRfinder (Grissa et al, 2007) or CRISPRDetect (Biswas et al, 2016) web utilities. See Figure S1B for a representative L. monocytogenes type II-A CRISPR array.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replication origin (oriC) was predicted by OriFinder (http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/Ori-Finder; Gao and Zhang, ). The presence of mobile genetic elements in the D. aquatica 174/2 genome was investigated by the following online tools: IslandViewer (http://pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandviewer; Dhillon et al ., ) for the GI regions, CRISPRDetect (http://brownlabtools.otago.ac.nz/CRISPRDetect/predict_crispr_array.html; Biswas et al ., ) for CRISPR arrays, whereas putative prophage sequences were identified by PHAST and PHASTER analysis (http://phast.wishartlab.com/; Zhou et al ., ; Arndt et al ., ). The genome sequence has been submitted to EMBL database under accession number GCA_900095885 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FASTA files for strains RC385, RC586, TMA11079-80, and HC-36A1 were used to identify CRISPR direct repeats and spacers in each sequence using the CRISPRFinder and CRISPRDetect programs (23,24,54). The CRISPRtionary program was used to determine how unique each spacer was to each strain (23,24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%