2022
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPRedict: a CRISPR-Cas9 web tool for interpretable efficiency predictions

Abstract: The development of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology has provided a simple yet powerful system for genome editing. Current gRNA design tools serve as an important platform for the efficient application of the CRISPR systems. However, most of the existing tools are black-box models that suffer from limitations, such as variable performance and unclear mechanism of decision making. Here, we introduce CRISPRedict, an interpretable gRNA efficiency prediction model for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. Its strength lies in the fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Konstantakos et al . [ 102 ] introduced a new interpretable gRNA efficiency prediction model and the related web tool, called CRISPRedict, including various regression and classification models for gRNA scoring. This web tool offers accurate efficiency predictions under different experimental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learning Models and Their Applications I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konstantakos et al . [ 102 ] introduced a new interpretable gRNA efficiency prediction model and the related web tool, called CRISPRedict, including various regression and classification models for gRNA scoring. This web tool offers accurate efficiency predictions under different experimental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learning Models and Their Applications I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 33 ) and Moreno-Mateos et al. ( 34 ), DeepSpCas9 ( 35 ), DeepHF (U6 promoter and T7 promoter) ( 36 ), Azimuth 2.0 ( 31 ), CRISPRedict (U6 promoter and T7 promoter) ( 37 ), Vienna Bioactivity CRISPR score (VBC) ( 38 ), CRISPick ( 39 ) and SPROUT ( 40 ). The majority of the gRNAs were designed regardless of the score calculated by any specific prediction software (Figure 1B – O ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared BoostMEC with 10 other competing models, including CRISPRon (CNN) [ 22 ], CRISPRedict (2 separate linear models, each optimized for U6 or T7 promoters) [ 8 ], DeepSpCas9 (CNN) [ 21 ], Azimuth (boosted regression trees) [ 14 , 15 ], and others [ 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 31 , 34 ] utilized in Haeussler et al [ 25 ]. Predictions for CRISPRon, CRISPRedict, and DeepSpCas9 were obtained by utilizing the software made available by the authors of each study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, methods based on conventional statistical or machine learning methods, often shown to have less competitive performance, are continuing to be explored for their interpretable properties. For example, in one recent study, Konstantakos and coauthors [ 8 ] developed a prediction tool based on binomial and linear regression, CRISPRedict, which achieves competitive performance compared to other recent tools, but with the added benefit of model explainability and interpretable predictions. In this paper, we contribute a novel tool termed BoostMEC for CRISPR efficiency prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation