2011
DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2011.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria and Indicators for Strategic Urban Forest Planning and Management

Abstract: The success of urban forest management is frequently predicated upon achieving absolute canopy cover targets. This two-dimensional view of the urban forest does not provide a comprehensive assessment of urban forest stewardship in a community and does not account for an area’s potential to support a forest canopy. A comprehensive set of performance-based criteria and indicators concerning the community’s vegetation resource, community framework and resource management approach is described. This set of broadly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using GIS-based mapping of social (eg social vulnerability, access to greenspace) and ecological (eg stormwater runoff, surface temperature) data helps to site UGI where the greatest social vulnerability overlaps with cooccurring climate-change hazards, although trade-offs are sometimes unavoidable (Meerow and Newell 2017). Diversity, connectivity, and regenerative ability are other ecological resilience traits commonly considered in UGI planning (Kenney et al 2011;Brandt et al 2016;Zhang et al 2019). While even simple inventories of such traits can enable planning for more resilient UGI (eg Brandt et al 2016), GIS-based mapping facilitates more holistic SES-based planning, and for example has been applied to increase the connectivity of urban parks while also promoting social and ecological benefits such as pedestrian paths, educational signage, stormwater management, and mitigation of the heat-island effect (Zhang et al 2019).…”
Section: Systems-based Planning Of Ugi For Urban Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using GIS-based mapping of social (eg social vulnerability, access to greenspace) and ecological (eg stormwater runoff, surface temperature) data helps to site UGI where the greatest social vulnerability overlaps with cooccurring climate-change hazards, although trade-offs are sometimes unavoidable (Meerow and Newell 2017). Diversity, connectivity, and regenerative ability are other ecological resilience traits commonly considered in UGI planning (Kenney et al 2011;Brandt et al 2016;Zhang et al 2019). While even simple inventories of such traits can enable planning for more resilient UGI (eg Brandt et al 2016), GIS-based mapping facilitates more holistic SES-based planning, and for example has been applied to increase the connectivity of urban parks while also promoting social and ecological benefits such as pedestrian paths, educational signage, stormwater management, and mitigation of the heat-island effect (Zhang et al 2019).…”
Section: Systems-based Planning Of Ugi For Urban Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike sample inventories, an inventory that is consistently updated allows urban forest managers to detect problems and manage proactively. The central principle guiding such adaptive approaches as that outlined in Kenney et al (2011) is an integrated, strategic, and forward-thinking tactic that transcends operational activities and considers the full magnitude of the urban forest's impacts.…”
Section: Urban Forestry In Small Municipalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing data is also a valuable tool for evaluating forest damage caused by tropical cyclones over very large areas (Wang et al, 2010). Granted, aerial UTC assessment approaches are currently limited in their ability to assess age structure and species composition (Leff, 2016) and may not necessarily reflect the condition of trees (Kenney et al, 2011). Nevertheless, this approach can provide extensive spatial and temporal data about the urban forest for researchers and managers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%