2016
DOI: 10.15804/tner.2016.46.4.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria and Indicators of University Education Quality : The Results of Expert Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where Azma (2011) listed some indicators about the learning environment to support virtual classes, paperless communications, and automated systems. Other researchers highlighted other areas such as monitor of education (Law et al, 2016), implementation indicators (Agrawal & Mittal, 2018), and competences and professional abilities (Bezpalko et al, 2016). Skordoulis et al (2015) proposed a set of characteristics that can be used to measure quality of education such as reputation, offered curriculum, services and additional services.…”
Section: Information Technology Indicators In Quality Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where Azma (2011) listed some indicators about the learning environment to support virtual classes, paperless communications, and automated systems. Other researchers highlighted other areas such as monitor of education (Law et al, 2016), implementation indicators (Agrawal & Mittal, 2018), and competences and professional abilities (Bezpalko et al, 2016). Skordoulis et al (2015) proposed a set of characteristics that can be used to measure quality of education such as reputation, offered curriculum, services and additional services.…”
Section: Information Technology Indicators In Quality Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams due to travel restrictions overseas during COVID-19, while one was face-to-face (Malaysia). This research strategy aimed to obtain necessary information reflected in the knowledge, opinions, and estimates of the respondents, who are competent persons [3]. The experts were from various backgrounds, including government agencies, academia, industry practitioners, and society members.…”
Section: Phase 1: Expert Interview For Gathering Scoping and Initial ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers followed an interview guideline when they interviewed the preservice teachers, discussing their cognitive obstacles more thoroughly. This was done based on the recommendations of Bezpalko, Klishevych, Liakh, and Pavliuk (2016), who stated that interview guidelines are useful for investigating a particular problem more thoroughly.…”
Section: Processing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%