Criteria Assessment Model for Sustainable Product Development

Turan, Faiz Mohd; Johan, Kartina; Nor, Nik Hisyamudin Muhd

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/160/1/012004

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A new “weighting criteria” was developed for the investigation process to quantify the evaluation criteria. It helps engineers to improve the effectiveness and objectivity of sustainable product development [ 39 ]. In addition, to improve the credibility of evaluation results, more hybrid methods have been developed [ 40 ].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, through literature review, it can be found that previous evaluation and selection of product design alternatives basically adopt a single preference structure [ 35 , 37 , 39 ], which cannot meet the different needs of evaluators. Apparently, these studies did not take the following factors into account, i.e., the difference in expression habits, educational backgrounds, knowledge, and experiences of different decision-makers.…”

Section: A Numerical Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Secondly, TOPSIS [ 36 , 39 ] and VIKOR [ 37 ] are often used to obtain the ranking results of the final alternatives in some existing researches on the evaluation of product design schemes or use the comprehensive coefficient method to get a total score of each scheme and then rank the schemes [ 35 ]. However, this method only focuses on the aggregation of individual opinions into group opinions, while ignoring the consensus degree among evaluators.…”

Section: A Numerical Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Consensus‐Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures

Chu

et al. 2021

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effectively satisfy the heterogeneous needs of evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results, the paper introduces a consensus-reaching approach that incorporates multiple preferences to the evaluation of product design alternatives. First, in order to obtain individual preference information, each evaluator is asked to evaluate all the design alternatives using a preference structure that he/she is familiar with. Second, we use a transfer function to uniform the evaluation information obtained from various preference structures into a complementary judgment matrix. Then, we use the Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) operator weight determination model to aggregate the preference information and obtain the group preference information. Then, we measure the consensus degree between individual evaluators and the group using a consensus measurement method. After that, we use the feedback mechanism to instruct individual evaluators to modify their preferences until a consensus is achieved. We explain the application steps and the feasibility of this approach through the evaluation of the design alternatives of multichannel fluorescence immunochromatography analyzers (MFIAs).

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Numerical Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Numerical Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Consensus‐Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures

Chu

et al. 2021

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The next step of data analysis is the quantification using "Weighing scale" and "Criteria based" [16]. Results from the calculated technique is to be interpreted from data tabulation on the line graph.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Sustainability Assessment Tool for Malaysian hydropower industry: A case study

Turan

Johan

Sofian

2018

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This research deals with the development of sustainability assessment tools as a medium to assess the performance of a hydropower project compliances towards sustainability practice. Since the increasing needs of implementing sustainability practice, developed countries are utilizing sustainability tools to achieve sustainable development goals. Its inception within ASEAN countries including Malaysia is still low. The problem with most tools developed from other countries is that it is not very comprehensive as well as its implementation factors are not suitable for the local environment that is not quantified. Hence, there is a need to develop a suitable sustainable assessment tool for the Malaysian hydropower industry to comply with the sustainable development goals as a bridging gap between the governor and the practitioner. The steps of achieving this goal is separated into several parts. The first part is to identify sustainable parameters from established tools as a model for comparison to enhance new parameters. The second stage is to convert equivalent quantification value from the model to the new developed tools. The last stage is to develop software program as a mean of gaining energy company feedback with systematic sustainable reporting from the surveyor so as to be able to integrate sustainability assessment, monitoring and reporting for self-improved reporting.

show abstract

“…The detail steps are described in the following paragraph [11]: (a) Categorise and summarise voice of customers. …”

Section: Map the Design Criteria To Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability Assessment Model in Product Development

Turan

Johan

Nor

et al. 2017

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Faster and more efficient development of innovative and sustainable products has become the focus for manufacturing companies in order to remain competitive in today's technologically driven world. Design concept evaluation which is the end of conceptual design is one of the most critical decision points. It relates to the final success of product development, because poor criteria assessment in design concept evaluation can rarely compensated at the later stages. Furthermore, consumers, investors, shareholders and even competitors are basing their decisions on what to buy or invest in, from whom, and also on what company report, and sustainability is one of a critical component. In this research, a new methodology of sustainability assessment in product development for Malaysian industry has been developed using integration of green project management, new scale of "Weighting criteria" and Rough-Grey Analysis. This method will help design engineers to improve the effectiveness and objectivity of the sustainable design concept evaluation, enable them to make better-informed decisions before finalising their choice and consequently create value to the company or industry. The new framework is expected to provide an alternative to existing methods.

show abstract

Criteria Assessment Model for Sustainable Product Development

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

A Consensus‐Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures

A Consensus‐Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures

Development of Sustainability Assessment Tool for Malaysian hydropower industry: A case study

Sustainability Assessment Model in Product Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About