1984
DOI: 10.1086/161926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for collapse and fragmentation of rotating, isothermal clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the initial clouds have different radii and masses with different metallicities, the ratio of thermal to gravitational energy (α0), which significantly affects the cloud collapse (e.g. Miyama et al 1984;Tsuribe & Inutsuka 1999a,b), is the same for all models (α0 = 0.47).…”
Section: Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the initial clouds have different radii and masses with different metallicities, the ratio of thermal to gravitational energy (α0), which significantly affects the cloud collapse (e.g. Miyama et al 1984;Tsuribe & Inutsuka 1999a,b), is the same for all models (α0 = 0.47).…”
Section: Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A remarkable amount of agreement is evident about the three possible endstates for collapse. Uniform density, isothermal clouds can expand to form equilibrium Bonnor-Ebert ellipsoids, collapse to form single protostars, or collapse and undergo fragmentation into two or more objects, depending on the initial values Of Cli = Ethermal/lEgravity] and ft = -Erototionaz/I^flrot^yl for t h e c l°u d -T h e empirical criteria (Figure 1) of Miyama et al (1984) are fairly good at delineating these three outcomes, with the exception of the low ft regime. Note the 'single' result for the a* = 0.55, ft = 0.02 model (Bodenheimer et al 1980), a model which clearly meets the o^ft < 0.12 criterion for fragmentation.…”
Section: Initially Uniform Density Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the intrinsically nonlinear, three-dimensional, non-stationary nature of the fragmentation process, our analytical understanding is still very rudimentary, being limited either to simple arguments such as the Jeans mass or to empirically-derived relations (e.g., the o^ft < 0.12 constraint of Miyama et al 1984; see section 2). Essentially all of our knowledge of fragmentation has come from numerical hydrodynamics calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A criterion for fragmentation in the presence of rotation was provided by the semi-analytical work of Tohline (1981), quantifying thermal support with the virial parameter α and the rotational versus gravitational energy in the cloud with the corresponding parameter β. The quantity αβ has since been used repeatedly to delimit the conditions for fragmentation (Miyama et al 1984, Hachisu & Eriguchi 1984, Tsuribe & Inutsuka 1999, Tohline 2002, for instance), and it was found that αβ < 0.1−0.2 typically leads to fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%