1988
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.1.13-17.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for disk susceptibility tests and quality control guidelines for the cefoperazone-sulbactam combination

Abstract: For in vitro susceptibility tests with cefoperazone and sulbactam (a I-lactamase inhibitor), 75/30-,ig disks may be used with the interpretive zone size breakpoints that are currently used for 75-,ug cefoperazone disks. For dilution tests, a 2:1 ratio of cefoperazone to sulbactam is recommended. For quality control purposes, MIC limits that are used to monitor cefoperazone tests were also applied to tests with the combination of drugs. For gram-negative control strains, zone size limits were calculated to be 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, 6 drugs (iAK, SCF I, SCF II, MEM, MINO and CIP) were selected to study the in vitro activity of drug combinations against MDRAB. The lower MIC of SCFI compared with SCF II demonstrated a comparatively increased rate of in vitro activity of SCF I against MDRAB, which was incompatible with previous studies ( 33 , 34 ). This discrepancy may arise from the geographical and biological evolutional differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, 6 drugs (iAK, SCF I, SCF II, MEM, MINO and CIP) were selected to study the in vitro activity of drug combinations against MDRAB. The lower MIC of SCFI compared with SCF II demonstrated a comparatively increased rate of in vitro activity of SCF I against MDRAB, which was incompatible with previous studies ( 33 , 34 ). This discrepancy may arise from the geographical and biological evolutional differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The antimicrobial susceptibility test for β-lactamase was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The antimicrobial agents used were ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), cefoperazone/sulbactam (SCFP), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), amikacin (AK), gentamicin (GM), ciprofloxacin (CFX), levofloxacin (LVX), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM), and colistin (CL) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England), and the results were interpreted using the CLSI 2009 criteria (Barry and Jones, 1988;Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2009).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cefoperazonesulbactam disks obtained from Pfizer Laboratories, New York, N.Y., contained 75 ,ug of cefoperazone and 30 jig of sulbactam. Interpretations (susceptible, .21 mm; resistant -15 mm) were done as described by Barry et al (1). Piperacillin-tazobactam disks with 100 and 10 ,ug, respectively, now marketed as Zosyn, were obtained from Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, N.Y.…”
Section: Resistance Due To Inducible 3-lactamase 2483mentioning
confidence: 99%