2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac8861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for energy conditions

Abstract: In model building studies, it is important to check the energy conditions for the corresponding energy–momentum tensor determined by the gravitational field equations in order to single out physically reasonable models. In this process, one often encounters a situation where the energy–momentum tensor has one off-diagonal ‘space–time’ component in the frame with an orthonormal basis in a given spacetime. We derive useful criteria of energy–momentum tensors for their Hawking–Ellis types and the standard energy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expression appears in each and every energy condition shown above, even in the DEC, although it is not obvious, since (ρ − q) 2 − (p r − q) 2 = (ρ − p r )(ρ + p r − 2q). An in-depth review of this type of matter content can be seen in [46] and more recently [47,48]. For an extended review of the Hawking-Ellis classification see [49] and the references therein.…”
Section: Dominant Energy Condition (Dec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression appears in each and every energy condition shown above, even in the DEC, although it is not obvious, since (ρ − q) 2 − (p r − q) 2 = (ρ − p r )(ρ + p r − 2q). An in-depth review of this type of matter content can be seen in [46] and more recently [47,48]. For an extended review of the Hawking-Ellis classification see [49] and the references therein.…”
Section: Dominant Energy Condition (Dec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases of a 1-form field and scalar fields with arbitrary potentials are well-known in the literature (e.g. see [31,35]), the DEC and SEC are satisfied for the former while, for the latter, the validity of the conditions depends on the potential: for V ≥ 0, DEC is satisfied but SEC might be violated when V ̸ = 0 while for V ≤ 0 SEC is respected but DEC might not hold when V ̸ = 0. That is one of the reasons why there is a link between the GMN no-go theorem (which assumes a non-positive potential for the dilaton -except for the massive type IIA case) and the strong energy condition validity.…”
Section: Energy Conditions For Fields and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases of a 1-form field and scalar fields with arbitrary potentials are well-known in the literature (e.g. see [31,35]), the DEC and SEC are satisfied for the former while, for the latter, the validity of the conditions depends on the potential: for V ≥ 0, DEC is satisfied but SEC might be violated when V = 0 while for V ≤ 0 SEC is respected but DEC might not hold when V = 0. That is one of the reasons why there is a link between the GMN no-go theorem (which assumes a non-positive potential for the dilaton) and the strong energy condition validity.…”
Section: Energy Conditions For Fields and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%