1988
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1988.393_151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for Evaluating Probability Distribution Models in Hydrologic Frequency Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the detailed integration periods of these climate models are usually only 20 years for both the present climate and the future climate under a greenhouse gas emission scenario, and a reliable assessment of the future change in rainfall with a long-term return period at each grid site is difficult, due to the limited number of samples (Takara and Takasao, 1988). Moreover, in general, the smallest scale of weather events which are able to be represented by a climate model is only a few times the size of the horizontal resolution of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detailed integration periods of these climate models are usually only 20 years for both the present climate and the future climate under a greenhouse gas emission scenario, and a reliable assessment of the future change in rainfall with a long-term return period at each grid site is difficult, due to the limited number of samples (Takara and Takasao, 1988). Moreover, in general, the smallest scale of weather events which are able to be represented by a climate model is only a few times the size of the horizontal resolution of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shiga Prefectural Government formulated information about the space-time distribution of the various return period floods such as 10, 30, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 years based on rain fall data in the past. Rainfall events with 200-, 500-, and 1000-year return periods were set at 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 times the rainfall size with a 100-year return period [3].…”
Section: Methodology For Evaluating Flood Hazard Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jackknife standard deviation shows the error of the estimation (Tung and Mays 1981;Takara and Takasao 1988;Fujibe 2011) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toyama and Mizuno (2002) adopted regional frequency analysis, which might produce less uncertainty of the estimation than other methods can. Kobayashi (2006) estimated probable precipitation using the AMeDAS dataset applying the jackknife method and standard least-square criterion (SLSC; Takara and Takasao 1988). Probable precipitation with a 1-km grid-cell was then calculated from interpolation of the sparse AMeDAS-based probable precipitations.…”
Section: Potential and Limitation Of R/a-based Probable Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%