2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14031251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria of “Effectiveness” and Related Aspects in Adaptive Reuse Projects of Heritage Buildings

Abstract: Adaptive reuse (AR) of heritage buildings is a complex process due to the involvement of many actions and actors, which influence the results of the projects. The effectiveness of AR projects can be described by various criteria. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the criteria of effectiveness in AR projects with the final scope to guide and improve the AR process. A review of the jury reports of two highly prestigious awards in the Netherlands (NRP Golden Phoenix award) and Europe (Europa … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is primarily associated with historic or iconic building or site restoration, structure or façade preservation, as well as interior renovation towards adapting an existing establishment to a new use [2,3]. Although adaptive reuse can sometimes generate controversy due to the nuanced distinctions among renovation, façadism, and other closely related architectural and construction practices [4], it is generally seen as a suitable compromise between (historic) preservation and demolition [5,6]. After all, such projects address the three pillars of sustainable development, namely the environment, economy, and society, well-serving the principles of the circular economy model [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is primarily associated with historic or iconic building or site restoration, structure or façade preservation, as well as interior renovation towards adapting an existing establishment to a new use [2,3]. Although adaptive reuse can sometimes generate controversy due to the nuanced distinctions among renovation, façadism, and other closely related architectural and construction practices [4], it is generally seen as a suitable compromise between (historic) preservation and demolition [5,6]. After all, such projects address the three pillars of sustainable development, namely the environment, economy, and society, well-serving the principles of the circular economy model [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to reusing or renovating existing built environments and, more specifically, heritage buildings, several studies have proposed different process models for the whole process [11] to not only preserve the values of heritage buildings but also to ensure effective results [12]. In this paper, the process model of Arfa et al (2022) is used as the backbone of the research, highlighting the necessity of the "analysis" of the existing built environment instead of starting from a blank page [8,9]. Figure 1 shows the model.…”
Section: Analysis As the Initial Step Of Transformation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several international studies focused on the villages of this province, and they concentrate on the plan's grammar rather than the details of the facades [6,7]. The aim of this study is to study and analyze the exterior facade details of these historic buildings and document them as a necessary step [8][9][10], before initiating their reuse to a new function or renovation to continue their lives as houses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is developed as a combination of different methods such as the complex adaptive system (CAS), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the structural equation model (SEM), the fuzzy evaluation, the judgment matrix, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Arfa et al [16] aimed to determine the parameters that enable choosing the ideal project. Parameters are provided from NRP Gulden Fenix Rapporten and Europa Nostra Awards specifications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%